
Why Postliberalism Failed Against Deneen
Aug 29, 2025
Tom tackles the nuances of Catholic post-liberalism, spotlighting Patrick Deneen as a central figure. He explores Deneen's critiques of liberalism, including its historical roots and social contract implications. The discussion dives into Deneen's views on divorce, culture, and localism while contrasting his perspectives with integralists. Tom also questions the weight of Deneen's critiques of capitalism and his ambivalence towards the U.S. Constitution. As the conversation unfolds, it reveals surprising intellectual admirations that shape Deneen's radicalization journey.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Liberalism As A Long Intellectual Thread
- Patrick Deneen ties modern problems to a long intellectual thread from Hobbes and Locke through the American founders to contemporary progressivism.
- Tom Howes argues this treats liberalism like an ideological virus that over-explains centuries of history.
Risk Of Over-Simplifying History
- Howes says Deneen frames social contract and consent as core drivers of modern voluntaristic ethics.
- He warns Deneen's method risks reducing complex history to a single causal idea.
Education, Not Just Ideas, Shapes Culture
- Howes disputes Deneen's linking of Locke's divorce view to sweeping ethical voluntarism.
- He contends many factors (education, institutions) better explain cultural thinning than abstract ideas alone.





