Climate activists are resorting to more extreme action in addressing the climate crisis. The podcast explores the history of radical environmentalism in the US and the impact of confrontational tactics. It also discusses the emergence of radical environmental groups and their challenges in achieving their goals.
Read more
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
auto_awesome
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
Confrontational and radical tactics used by climate activists aim to shock the public into paying attention to the climate crisis, generating support for more moderate forms of activism.
The history of radical environmentalism and the civil rights movement show that extreme tactics can bring attention to the climate crisis and stimulate conversations towards meaningful action on climate change.
Deep dives
Growing Radical Flank of Climate Activism
Since the Biden administration took office, there has been a growing radical flank within the climate activism movement. Activists are engaging in confrontational and radical tactics such as vandalism, disrupting events, blocking traffic, and using crazy glue for protests. These tactics aim to shock the general public into paying attention to the climate crisis, despite often turning off some individuals. However, research shows that these actions draw attention to the issue and can generate support for more moderate forms of activism.
The Origins and Evolution of Radical Environmentalism
The modern environmental movement began in the late 1950s as a response to the alarming disappearance of natural resources and pollutants caused by post-war affluence. Initially, there was bipartisan support for environmental laws, but in the 1970s, a backlash from industry fostered a more radical and less compromising wing of the movement. Earth First, founded in 1980, exemplified this radicalism through acts of civil disobedience and low-level sabotage. The Earth Liberation Front (ELF) emerged in the mid-1990s and carried out numerous arson attacks targeting polluting industries. However, the ELF's tactics were not as effective in achieving their desired change. Contemporary climate activism echoes these past movements, with activists resorting to unconventional tactics as traditional channels for change appear insufficient.
Lessons from Past Movements and the Future of Activism
The history of the civil rights movement serves as a parallel to the climate movement's potential trajectory. Frustration with incremental progress led to more radical tactics, such as nonviolent civil disobedience, which both sparked counter-movements and motivated sympathizers. Similarly, today's climate activists may undergo a similar radicalization process as they face the slow pace of change. While the effectiveness of extreme tactics is debated, they do bring attention to the climate crisis and can stimulate conversations towards addressing the problem. It is likely that civil disobedience and more confrontational activism will continue to be prevalent in the future as activists push for meaningful action on climate change.
Climate activists have tried marching and lobbying. Now, a growing flank of movement radicals want to take more extreme action. Author Dana Fisher tells us who they are, and sociologist Matthew Wolfe traces the history of radical environmentalism in the US.
Today's episode was produced by Avishay Artsy with an assist from Siona Peterous. It was edited by Miranda Kennedy and fact-checked by Jon Ehrens. Our engineer is Patrick Boyd.