The Intelligence from The Economist Clerical era: Iran’s elections
Feb 21, 2020
In this insightful discussion, John O'Sullivan, author of the Buttonwood column, analyzes Iran's political landscape as hardliners limit parliamentary candidates, intensifying public discontent. He also reflects on the controversial legacy of Michael Milken, examining his impact on the junk bond market and recent presidential pardon. The conversation dives into Japan's low passport ownership, unraveling cultural and economic reasons behind this paradox. Tune in for a compelling blend of finance, politics, and international relations!
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Iran's Limited Elections
- Iran's Guardian Council bars many reformers and moderates from running in elections.
- This limits voter choice and pushes the country towards hardline rule.
Election as Revenge?
- Hardliners aim to portray the election as a united front against America.
- However, this strategy may backfire due to limited candidate choices and public frustration.
Predicted Low Turnout
- Low voter turnout is expected due to limited choices and frustration with the regime.
- This could further undermine the clerical regime's legitimacy.