The Decibel

Testimony underway in Hockey Canada sexual-assault trial

May 8, 2025
Robyn Doolittle, a Staff Reporter at The Globe, covers the ongoing trial involving five members of Canada’s 2018 world junior hockey team accused of sexual assault. She highlights the intense cross-examination of the complainant, E.M., revealing the complexities of memory and consent. Doolittle discusses a powerful rally outside the courthouse advocating for survivors, alongside the emotional turmoil faced by E.M. during her testimony. The conversation also delves into the legal intricacies surrounding these serious allegations and societal implications regarding consent.
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
INSIGHT

Understanding Consent's Crucial Timing

  • Consent must be given in the moment and for every specific sexual act. Retroactive consent is not valid in sexual assault cases.
ANECDOTE

EM's Testimony on the Assault Night

  • EM testified about feeling very intoxicated and shocked when multiple players entered the hotel room. She described feeling numb and forced to comply to keep herself safe.
INSIGHT

Defense Challenges EM's Account

  • The defense argued EM invited teammates and acted consensually, but EM was often confused and out of it. Memory lapses from intoxication complicate perceptions of consent in the trial.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app