Redacted News 3: They're LYING about Charlie Kirk's murder and they know it, new details just emerged | Redacted
10 snips
Sep 17, 2025 Guests Owen Schroer, a media analyst, critiques the inconsistencies surrounding the murder case of Charlie Kirk, discussing missing evidence and timeline discrepancies. Environmental activist Dane Wigington explores the implications of recent congressional hearings on cloud seeding and its distinction from climate engineering. Constitutional commentator Lionel discusses defamation laws in light of high-profile media suits, while Kevin DeMeritt analyzes the Federal Reserve's recent decisions, predicting their effects on the dollar and precious metals investment strategies.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Timeline And Note Inconsistencies
- The FBI released a text thread and claimed a destroyed confession note, but the timeline and content raise major inconsistencies.
- Hosts argue those inconsistencies undermine confidence in the official narrative of Charlie Kirk's killing.
Note Might Be A Deliberate Distraction
- Owen Schroer calls the presented note and FBI explanation 'nonsensical' and likely a distraction.
- He suggests the note conveniently ties up loose ends and may have been fabricated or reconstructed to fit the narrative.
Missing HD Footage Is The Biggest Gap
- Multiple gaps exist: wrong initial arrests, odd clothing changes, and missing HD campus footage.
- The hosts argue missing camera footage behind Charlie is the 'ultimate' unresolved piece of evidence.