Tech reporter and senior policy analyst Emily Baker-White joins the show to discuss TikTok's negotiations with the US government, concerns about its links to China, and the creation of a third-party executive security committee. They also explore the potential implications of TikTok's recommendation algorithm and the future of free speech on the platform.
The draft agreement between TikTok and the US government highlights the challenges of regulating social media and raises concerns about potential government surveillance powers.
The negotiations also shed light on the tension between addressing national security concerns and protecting fundamental rights, particularly freedom of speech on social media platforms.
Deep dives
TikTok's Dominance as a Speech Platform and its Growth in E-commerce
TikTok has become the dominant speech platform in the United States with 150 million American users who spend an average of 90 minutes a day on the app. The company has been quietly expanding and focusing on e-commerce, particularly in Asia, and aims to bring that success to Western markets. While there were concerns about TikTok's links to China, the draft deal between TikTok and the US government from last year showed the measures the company was willing to take to address those concerns and remain operational in the US. The negotiations highlight the challenges of regulating social media and the potential for government surveillance powers.
The Draft Agreement and Its Implications for TikTok's Operations
The draft agreement between TikTok and the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) outlined the government's broad power over TikTok, granting agencies the ability to veto decisions and giving the CFIUS Monitoring Agencies (CMAs) non-objection power. One significant aspect was giving the CMAs control over changes to platform policies, including content policies, potentially impacting freedom of speech. The agreement also proposed the creation of a third-party executive security committee operating independently from ByteDance, TikTok's parent company. The agreement raises questions about the practicality of implementing such control over a speech platform and its potential impact on free speech rights.
Uncertain Future and Political Considerations
The future of TikTok's operations in the US remains uncertain, with negotiations ongoing. The political reality, including the upcoming presidential election, makes it less likely for the Biden administration to ban TikTok. However, concerns about national security risks have led to prolonged discussions and the absence of an official regulation of the company. The unique case of TikTok raises questions about other social media companies and their potential vulnerability to government regulation. The tension lies in striking a balance between addressing national security concerns and maintaining independence for speech platforms while protecting fundamental rights.
In the spring, it looked like TikTok was on the verge of being banned in America. Since then, it’s continued operating business as usual.
But this week, it was revealed that ByteDance and the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States came close to striking a deal that would allow TikTok to continue operating in the U.S. The negotiations give a glimpse into how social media—and by extension speech itself—could be regulated on the internet.
If you enjoy this show, please consider signing up for Slate Plus. Slate Plus members get benefits like zero ads on any Slate podcast, bonus episodes of shows like Slow Burn and Dear Prudence—and you’ll be supporting the work we do here on What Next TBD. Sign up now at slate.com/whatnextplus to help support our work.