Trump's Terms 'You can't interpret silence to be a resignation:' email stokes confusion
Feb 24, 2025
A new federal directive is causing waves among employees, demanding weekly accomplishment reports or facing dismissal. Confusion reigns as some bosses advise caution before responding, igniting debates over the legality and implications for workers' rights. Legal experts weigh in on the interpretation of this controversial mandate, questioning its impact on the federal workforce.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
OPM Email Creates Confusion
- The Office of Personnel Management's email demanding weekly accomplishments from federal employees sparked confusion and legal questions.
- Some agencies advised holding off on replies, contradicting OPM's request and causing frustration among workers.
Legality of OPM Request
- The OPM's authority to manage employees outside its own agency is questioned, potentially violating labor laws.
- Silence or non-response to the email cannot be interpreted as a resignation, as resignations must be voluntary.
Seek Clarification from Supervisors
- Federal workers facing unclear instructions should ask supervisors directly for clarification regarding the OPM email.
- Direct communication can reduce confusion caused by mixed messages from different agencies.