Hugh Son, a CNBC reporter with deep insights into the Synapse scandal, breaks down the chaos following the collapse of the fintech company. He discusses the alarming $95 million shortfall and the failures of regulators in protecting consumers. The conversation highlights the complexities of FDIC insurance and how many users were left vulnerable. Accountability among banks is scrutinized, as well as the dire need for reform in the regulatory landscape to safeguard fintech users against similar disasters in the future.
The collapse of Synapse exposes significant regulatory failures in protecting consumers navigating complex fintech structures and FDIC insurance limitations.
The evolving two-tier banking system raises consumer safety concerns, as many fintechs lack adequate protections when partnerships fail.
Deep dives
FDIC Insurance and Its Evolution
FDIC insurance was established to protect depositors from losses incurred when banks fail, relieving the need for individuals to assess a bank's safety. Historically, the government's involvement created a safety net for depositors, yet recent developments have revealed a troubling shift as newer depository institutions emerged that operate outside of FDIC insurance. This has led to confusion regarding the security of funds held in accounts with various fintech companies like Apple Pay or Cash App, which may not have the same protections as traditional banks. The responsibility has shifted back to consumers, who are now left to navigate complex structures to determine whether their money is adequately insured.
The Consequences of the Two-Tier Banking System
A two-tier banking system has emerged, raising concerns about consumer safety as many fintech companies operate as intermediaries between customers and banks without direct FDIC coverage. Customers using apps like Yotta, which partnered with Synapse, have found themselves vulnerable to losing deposits when the intermediary fails, as existing protections do not extend to these fintech entities. Some users have faced significant losses or lengthy delays in accessing their funds, underscoring the potential downsides of relying on unregulated institutions. This situation has highlighted the failures of regulators to adapt to the evolution of fintech and ensure consumer protection in this rapidly changing landscape.
The Role of Synapse in Consumer Losses
The company Synapse functioned as middleware for several fintech apps, allowing them to provide banking-like services without holding direct deposits. However, when Synapse encountered financial difficulties, a significant shortfall emerged, leading to a loss of up to $95 million, severely affecting its customers' access to their funds. Users expected their deposits to be protected under FDIC insurance, based on the partnerships advertised by the fintechs, only to discover that such coverage was limited to the banks in the background and not to Synapse itself. The fallout from Synapse's failure has revealed critical issues in how consumers understand their financial protections and the intricate relationships between fintechs and traditional banks.
Regulatory Implications and Future Outlook
This ongoing crisis within fintech highlights the urgent need for regulatory reform to protect consumers from similar occurrences in the future. Proposals have emerged suggesting that regulators should reevaluate the criteria for which entities receive FDIC insurance, extending protections to fintechs that collect deposits. In the absence of tighter regulations, customers may remain hesitant to entrust their funds to emerging financial technologies, fearing potential loss without adequate recourse. As the landscape evolves, a potential shift toward stricter oversight may lead to a more stable integration of fintech within traditional banking systems.
In this Money Talks: The collapse of Synapse and resulting fallout highlights how regulators are failing fintech users. Felix Salmon is joined by CNBC’s Hugh Son who has been closely following the situation. They unpack the chain of events that led to thousands of users losing access to their funds, the complexities of FDIC insurance, and how regulators allowed this massive scandal.
Want to hear that discussion and hear more Slate Money? Join Slate Plus to unlock weekly bonus episodes. Plus, you’ll access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. You can subscribe directly from the Slate Money show page on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Or, visit slate.com/moneyplus to get access wherever you listen.
Podcast production by Jessamine Molli and Cheyna Roth.