
If Books Could Kill Sapiens
198 snips
Nov 20, 2025 Delve into the fascinating critique of Yuval Noah Harari's 'Sapiens' as the hosts unpack his portrayal of cognitive, agricultural, and scientific revolutions. They debate the validity of Harari's timelines and challenge his notion that agriculture was a mistake, revealing a more complex relationship with human development. The discussion spans social constructs like laws and nations, while critiquing Harari's arguments on human rights and the Eurocentric narrative of science. The conversation wraps up with thoughts on happiness and the future, blending humor with insightful analysis.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Fictions Explain Large-Scale Cooperation
- Yuval Harari frames human dominance as driven by our ability to create and believe shared fictions like religion and money.
- Michael Hobbs and Peter Shamshery challenge this as oversimplified and non-falsifiable compared to archaeological nuance.
Cognitive Revolution Is Oversimplified
- Harari's 'Cognitive Revolution' claim (70k years ago, Europe-centric burst) is outdated and contradicted by African archaeological evidence.
- Michael emphasizes that cultural complexity arose gradually over hundreds of thousands of years across Africa, not a sudden European explosion.
Agriculture's Effects Were Complex
- Anthropologists told Michael and Peter that comparing forager and farmer well-being is complex and context-dependent.
- The shift to agriculture took centuries and produced mixed effects like population growth and changes in infant mortality.












