Explore the lasting effects of the Insular Cases on the civil rights and lives of people in US territories. Learn about the philosophy of manifest destiny, debates around territorial acquisition, and the constitutional rights disparity between territories and the continental US. Discover the court cases and arguments surrounding the Insular Cases, including the impact on Puerto Rico's legal status. Uncover the limitations on constitutional rights for people in territories and the issue of legal racism.
Read more
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
auto_awesome
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
The Insular Cases established that US territories were part of the country in some ways but not others, resulting in unequal rights and representation for residents.
The podcast explores the historical context of US territorial expansion, including motivations for acquiring territories in the Caribbean and Pacific, such as military strategy, economic opportunities, and refueling points, and the racist justifications used to deny constitutional rights to the population of these territories.
Deep dives
The Insular Cases: Limitations on US Territories' Rights
The podcast episode explores a series of US Supreme Court cases known as the Insular Cases, which limited the rights of people living in certain US territories. The cases, decided in 1901, established that these territories, including Puerto Rico, Guam, the Philippines, and American Samoa, were part of the United States in some ways but not others. The decisions outlined the concept of incorporated and unincorporated territories, leading to unequal treatment and representation for residents. While some scholars argue that the cases were rooted in racism and colonialism, others question the impact of overturning these decisions. Recent cases have upheld elements of the Insular Cases, highlighting ongoing challenges faced by residents of these territories.
The Historical Context of US Territorial Expansion
The podcast delves into the historical context of US territorial expansion before and after the Spanish-American War. It discusses the original borders of the United States, the acquisition of new territories through treaties and purchases, and the concept of Manifest Destiny that fueled US expansion across North America. The episode highlights the motivations behind US acquisition of territories in the Caribbean and the Pacific, such as military strategy, economic opportunities, and strategic refueling points. It also acknowledges the racist justifications used to withhold full constitutional rights from the primarily Hispanic and indigenous populations of these territories.
The Impact on People Living in US Territories
The podcast examines the lasting impact of the Insular Cases on the lives and civil rights of people residing in US territories. It explains how these cases continue to affect the territories' residents, who are often denied the same constitutional rights and representation in Congress as citizens of the 50 states and Washington, D.C. The episode emphasizes the complexities and differing opinions within the territories regarding their relationship to the United States. It highlights the struggles for self-determination, debates about statehood, and diverse perspectives on cultural preservation versus US citizenship.
Contemporary Relevance and Ongoing Debates
The podcast addresses the contemporary relevance of the Insular Cases and the ongoing debates surrounding their impact. It discusses recent Supreme Court cases that upheld elements of the Insular Cases, reinforcing the unequal treatment and representation of people in US territories. While some argue for overturning these decisions as rooted in racism and colonialism, others question the potential outcomes and consequences. The episode acknowledges the complexities of balancing constitutional rights, cultural preservation, and the right to self-determination for residents of these territories.
The Insular Cases are SCOTUS cases regarding rights of people in U.S. territories. They’re considered U.S. citizens from birth, but they don’t have the same constitutional rights or representation as citizens who live in one of the 50 states.
Research:
Armstrong v. United States, 182 U.S. 243 (1901). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/182/243/
Britannica, The Editors of Encyclopaedia. "Sanford Ballard Dole". Encyclopedia Britannica, 5 Jun. 2023, https://www.britannica.com/biography/Sanford-Ballard-Dole. Accessed 31 July 2023.
Carstensen, Vernon. “The Constitutional and Territorial Expansion.” https://naldc.nal.usda.gov/download/IND88053401/pdf
DeLima v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 1 (1901). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/182/1/
Dooley v. United States, 182 U.S. 222 (1901). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/182/222/
Dooley v. United States, 183 U.S. 151 (1901). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/183/151/
Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/182/244/
Erman, Sam. “Meanings of Citizenship in the U.S. Empire: Puerto Rico, Isabel Gonzalez, and the Supreme Court, 1898 to 1905.” Journal of American Ethnic History Summer 2008 Volume 27, Number 4.
Fiol-Matta, Lía. “Future of the Insular Cases.” Latino Justice. https://www.latinojustice.org/en/latinojusticeopina/future-insular-cases
Fourteen Diamond Rings v. United States, 183 U.S. 176 (1901). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/183/176/
Gelpí, Gustavo A. “The Insular Cases: A Comparative Historical Study of Puerto Rico, Hawai‘i, and the Philippines.” The Federal Lawyer | March/April 2011.
Gershon, Livia. “The Myth of Manifest Destiny.” JSTOR Daily. 5/5/2021. https://daily.jstor.org/the-myth-of-manifest-destiny/
Goetze v. United States, 182 U.S. 221 (1901). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/182/221/
Howe, Amy. “Court declines to take up petition seeking to overturn Insular Cases.” SCOTUS Blog. 10/17/2022. https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/10/court-declines-to-take-up-petition-seeking-to-overturn-insular-cases/
Huus v. New York & Porto Rico Steamship Co., 182 U.S. 392 (1901). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/182/392/
National Archives. “Louisiana Purchase Treaty (1803).” https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/louisiana-purchase-treaty#no-1
Perez, Lisa Maria. “Citizenship Denied: The ‘Insular Cases’ and the Fourteenth Amendment.” Virginia Law Review , Jun., 2008, Vol. 94, No. 4 (Jun., 2008). https://www.jstor.org/stable/25470577
Ponsa-Kraus, Christina. “The Insular Cases Run Amok: Against Constitutional Exceptionalism in the Territories.” Yale Law Journal. Vol. 131, No. 8. June 2022. https://www.yalelawjournal.org/article/the-insular-cases-run-amok
Sparrow, Bartholomew H. "Insular Cases." Encyclopedia of the Supreme Court of the United States, edited by David S. Tanenhaus, vol. 2, Macmillan Reference USA, 2008, pp. 476-481. Gale In Context: U.S. History, link.gale.com/apps/doc/CX3241200487/GPS?u=mlin_n_melpub&sid=bookmark-GPS&xid=91c70605. Accessed 25 July 2023.
Supreme Court of the United States. “UNITED STATES v. VAELLO MADERO.” Argued November 9, 2021—Decided April 21, 2022. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-303_6khn.pdf
Topol, Sarah A., and Glenna Gordon. "The America That Americans Forget." The New York Times Magazine, 9 July 2023, p. 22(L). Gale General OneFile, link.gale.com/apps/doc/A756508304/GPS?u=mlin_n_melpub&sid=bookmark-GPS&xid=9e9434c8. Accessed 25 July 2023.
Torruella, Juan R. “Ruling America's Colonies: The Insular Cases” Yale Law & Policy Review. 32:57. 2013.
Torruella, Juan R. “The Insular Cases: The Establishment of a Regime of Political Apartheid.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law. Winter 2007. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/jil/vol29/iss2/1/
S. Department of the Interior Office of Insular Affairs. “Definitions of Insular Area Political Organizations.” https://www.doi.gov/oia/islands/politicatypes
S. State Department Office of the Historian. “Louisiana Purchase, 1803 .” https://history.state.gov/milestones/1801-1829/louisiana-purchase.
Wallach, Sherry Levin. “The Insular Cases Must Be Overturned.” Bloomberg Law. 8/3/2022. https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/the-insular-cases-must-be-overturned
Yale Law School. “Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo; February 2, 1848.” https://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/guadhida.asp