

EMQs: Our Keir Year, modern Machiavellis and fairness in politics
16 snips Jul 7, 2025
This discussion dives into the philosophical complexities of fairness in tax and welfare, highlighting middle-class struggles. There's a candid look at Keir Starmer's tenure, with listeners grappling with his leadership and core beliefs. The conversation shifts to the influence of academic economists in government roles, questioning the UK's approach. In a twist, they explore the Machiavellian traits of recent politicians, subtly suggesting tactical moves behind the scenes. Finally, the importance of honest advisors versus Machiavellian politics is underscored.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Three Concepts of Fairness
- Fairness in politics has multiple philosophical interpretations, including Rawlsian fairness, capability fairness, and Nozickian fairness.
- Politics seeks a balance between supporting the poorest, ensuring equal opportunities, and rewarding hard work and achievement.
Broad Tax Base Needed
- Targeting taxation only at the very rich is insufficient because many billionaires can avoid taxes.
- Governments must often broaden the tax base to include the top 10% and beyond for sufficient revenue.
Communicate Purpose of Taxes
- Politicians must clearly communicate the purpose of tax increases to unite public support.
- Without this, middle-income earners may feel squeezed and become susceptible to populist movements.