AMSSM Sports Medcasts
Top Sports Medicine Articles Podcast – PRP vs. Steroid Injections for Tennis Elbow
Nov 7, 2024
Discover the debate over corticosteroid injections versus platelet-rich plasma for tennis elbow treatment. Experts dive into a systematic review revealing that while corticosteroids provide quicker relief, PRP shows greater long-term effectiveness. They discuss the variability in PRP formulations and the importance of understanding treatment nuances. Challenges like patient preferences and insurance coverage are also touched upon, highlighting the need for standardized practices. Tune in for insights that enhance clinical discussions!
09:58
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- Corticosteroid injections provide superior short-term relief for lateral epicondylitis compared to platelet-rich plasma within the first month post-treatment.
- Although platelet-rich plasma shows better long-term effectiveness at three and six months, challenges in standardization and methodology complicate treatment comparisons.
Deep dives
Comparison of Treatment Options for Lateral Epicondylitis
Corticosteroid injections provide significant short-term relief for lateral epicondylitis, as indicated by higher visual analog scale (VAS) and DASH scores at the one-month mark when compared to platelet-rich plasma (PRP). A systematic review included 13 studies after rigorous selection criteria, showing the corticosteroid's superior effectiveness during this initial period. However, at three and six months, PRP demonstrated better patient outcomes, making it a more favorable long-term option. This assessment reveals a common clinical dilemma, balancing immediate pain relief with the potential for prolonged recovery benefits.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
