Why urbanists are wrong about AVs w/ Tesla critic Ed Niedermeyer
Aug 17, 2023
auto_awesome
Author Edward Niedermeyer discusses the misconceptions about autonomous vehicles (AVs) and urbanists' views. He emphasizes the distinction between AVs and Teslas' autopilot system. Niedermeyer highlights the need for legislative action on automaker safety standards and factors driving AV adoption. The chapter also explores the controversy surrounding AVs and the importance of public education. Understanding the difference between AVs and traditional cars is crucial for reshaping cities and mobility.
L4 vehicles should be seen as robotic mobility infrastructure rather than traditional cars, shaping opinions and informing decisions about the technology.
Public education, engagement, transparency, and regulation are essential for addressing concerns and misinformation about L4 vehicles.
Deep dives
Importance of Understanding the Difference Between L4 Vehicles and Cars
It is crucial to recognize that L4 vehicles, such as robotaxis, are fundamentally different from cars. L4 vehicles should be seen as robotic mobility infrastructure rather than traditional cars. Understanding this distinction is essential in shaping opinions and making informed decisions about the technology.
The Need for Public Education and Engagement
The controversy surrounding L4 vehicles highlights the importance of public education and engagement on this technology. There is a lack of understanding among the general public, including urbanists, about the capabilities and potential benefits of L4 vehicles. Enhanced public discourse, transparency, and education are necessary to address concerns and misinformation.
Safety and Regulation Considerations
Safety is a critical aspect of L4 vehicle implementation. While there are valid concerns about the technology, it is essential to put them in context. Companies working on L4 vehicles, such as Waymo and Cruise, prioritize safety and employ advanced sensor systems. Comparatively, there may be more significant safety concerns with current self-driving technologies, such as Tesla's autopilot. A focus on transparency, regulation, and public outreach is crucial to address safety concerns.
Opportunities for Urbanists and Micro Mobility Advocates
Urbanists and advocates of micro mobility should view L4 vehicles as an opportunity rather than a threat. L4 vehicles have the potential to complement existing transportation systems and contribute to reduced traffic congestion and improved road safety. Understanding the distinction between L4 vehicles and traditional cars enables better collaboration to shape the integration of this technology into cities, aligning with urbanist values.
Jame Gross interviews Edward Niedermeyer, the author of Ludicrous: The Unvarnished Story of Tesla Motors. Nathan Robinson has suggested that there is "probably no greater expert on the career of Elon Musk and the development of Tesla [than Niedermeyer]." His insights regarding Tesla Autopilot in particular have been cited repeatedly.
Chapters:
00:00 - 03:54 CPUC ruling on paid operations on L4 AVs in San Francisco
03:55 - 07:29 Will L4 AVs lead to much less traffic violence?
07:30 - 09:09 Teslas are not L4 AVs
09:10 - 21:03 Are urbanists are wrong about L4 AVs?
21:04 - 27:56 The L4 AV tech is very real and should push automakers to do more
27:57 - 35:50 Demos of different vision technology, regulation and safety marketing
35:51 - 38:10 AV technology is how we get out of car monopoly hell
In August 2023, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) approved permits for Cruise and Waymo to charge fares for passenger service in San Francisco.
The CPUC agreement for AVs to operate in San Francisco includes a number of safety and operational requirements that the companies must meet. These requirements include:
The AVs must be equipped with a variety of sensors and cameras to detect and avoid obstacles.
The AVs must be able to operate in a variety of weather conditions.
The AVs must have a safety driver on board who can take control of the vehicle if necessary.
The AVs must be operated in a safe and responsible manner.
The approval of the CPUC agreement is a major milestone for the development and deployment of AVs in San Francisco. It is the first time that AVs have been allowed to operate without a safety driver on board in a major U.S. city. The agreement is expected to help to accelerate the development and commercialization of AVs, and it could lead to the widespread deployment of AVs in San Francisco and other cities in the future.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode