
Ruled by Reason
How Exactly Does Common Ownership Harm Competition? A Conversation with Florian Ederer, Jerry S. Cohen Award Winner for Antitrust Scholarship
Episode guests
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- Common ownership can significantly diminish competition by allowing firms to coordinate indirectly, resulting in higher prices for consumers.
- The incentive structures influenced by common ownership lead to less efficient management behavior, reducing the profitability motivation for CEOs.
Deep dives
The Impact of Common Ownership on Competition
Common ownership refers to the phenomenon where large investors own shares in competing firms, potentially leading to reduced incentives for those firms to compete vigorously against each other. The podcast highlights research that demonstrates how common ownership can soften competition by enabling firms to coordinate indirectly through their structures rather than explicit collusion. This idea, which dates back several decades, has gained renewed attention as empirical evidence has emerged, linking common ownership to anticompetitive effects across various industries. Notably, a study indicated that higher levels of common ownership in the airline industry resulted in higher ticket prices due to diminished competitive pressure among airlines sharing the same investors.