POLITICO Tech
It’s TikTok day at the Supreme Court
Jan 10, 2025
Alan Rozenshtein, a law professor at the University of Minnesota and former lawyer in the Justice Department's National Security Division, joins the discussion on TikTok's urgent battle against a possible U.S. ban. The conversation dives into the implications of the Supreme Court's upcoming arguments and the potential outcomes that could reshape the app's future. Rozenshtein also unpacks the complexities of free speech versus national security, while examining the intricate ties between politics and legal decisions surrounding the social media platform.
19:15
Episode guests
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- TikTok's appeal to the Supreme Court is complicated by established legal principles and skepticism about its chances of success.
- The case underscores a tension between First Amendment rights and national security concerns, highlighting the complexities of free expression amid potential threats.
Deep dives
TikTok's Supreme Court Challenge
TikTok faces a potential ban in the U.S., prompting the company to appeal to the Supreme Court for intervention. The court's reception to TikTok's arguments is critical, especially following a previous defeat at the D.C. Circuit Court, where judges from both liberal and conservative backgrounds unanimously ruled against it. Alan Rosenstein, a law professor, expresses skepticism about TikTok's chances of success in the Supreme Court, suggesting that the legal principles at stake are well established and unlikely to shift. With a deadline looming for the ban to take effect, the urgency of TikTok's situation adds pressure to the proceedings.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
