Bulwark Takes
SCOTUS Delivers Gut Punch to Trump’s Due Process Fantasy
Apr 8, 2025
Ryan Goodman, a legal expert and friend from Just Security, joins Sam Stein to dissect a crucial Supreme Court ruling affecting Trump’s use of the Alien Enemies Act. They delve into its implications for Venezuelan migrants and due process rights, highlighting the court's unanimous stance on habeas corpus. The duo also discusses the legal intricacies surrounding deportations, the accountability of past actions, and the controversial MS-13 case that underscores the importance of evidence in judicial proceedings. Get ready for a deep dive into constitutional rights!
13:40
Episode guests
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- The Supreme Court's ruling affirms that detained individuals under the Alien Enemies Act still possess essential due process rights, including habeas corpus.
- Future habeas petitions could scrutinize the constitutionality of the Alien Enemies Act and challenge the government's authority in deportation matters.
Deep dives
Supreme Court's Ruling on Habeas Rights
The Supreme Court ruled on a case involving the deportation of Venezuelan migrants under the Aliens Enemies Act. The court determined that the district court had incorrectly handled the lawsuit, stating it should have been filed as a habeas petition in the jurisdiction of Texas, where the detainees were held. This ruling clarified that individuals detained under the Act still retain due process rights, including the right to be notified and the opportunity to pursue habeas petitions before being deported. The decision suggests that while the government may claim authority to deport individuals swiftly, they must still respect the legal rights of detainees.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
