

Planned Parenthood’s Cash Flow on Trial
12 snips Apr 15, 2025
Dive into the heated debate over Medicaid funding for abortion as the podcast explores the Supreme Court case Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic. Discover the legal arguments surrounding taxpayer cash and its implications for providers. Hear contrasting viewpoints on the moral controversy, providing a balanced perspective on a highly charged issue. The discussion highlights the cultural significance of these debates, making it a thought-provoking listen for anyone interested in the intersection of law, ethics, and healthcare.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Medicaid and Abortion Funding
- South Carolina Governor Henry McMaster directed that Medicaid funds not go to abortion providers.
- He argued that such payments subsidize abortion and deny the right to life.
Qualified Provider Debate
- The Supreme Court debated whether South Carolina must allow Medicaid funds to Planned Parenthood.
- Existing law allows Medicaid for any qualified provider chosen by the patient.
Planned Parenthood as Healthcare
- Planned Parenthood's claim that abortion is healthcare is dubious.
- The Supreme Court will decide if they are a qualified medical practice.