David Spence, a natural resources law expert at the University of Texas, dissects how identity politics fuel partisanship in U.S. energy policy. He highlights the urgent need for bipartisan efforts in the clean energy transition. Spence contrasts historical collaboration with today's divisiveness, examines the effects of social media on public discourse, and underscores the importance of personal connections in reshaping perceptions of energy policies. His insights spark hope for overcoming ideological barriers in addressing climate change.
The rise of identity politics and negative partisanship has hindered bipartisan dialogue crucial for addressing climate change and energy policy.
Historical 'Republican moments' demonstrate the importance of collective political action in achieving significant environmental regulations amidst current partisan divides.
Deep dives
The Rise of Political Contempt
Contempt in the political sphere refers to a notable rise in partisan animosity, distinct from mere ideological polarization. Over recent decades, this animosity has become increasingly bitter, as both parties engage in negative partisanship, leading to a breakdown in dialogue on critical issues like climate change and energy policy. The podcast discusses how social media has contributed to this toxic atmosphere, where hostile discourse thrives and common ground is obscured. With this backdrop, it becomes crucial to facilitate bipartisan dialogue to navigate the pressing energy transition ahead.
Historical Context of Bipartisan Action
The discussion addresses historical periods known as 'Republican moments,' when bipartisan actions collectively tackled key national challenges. Historically, significant environmental and energy regulations emerged from these instances, characterized by a combination of public demand and a conducive political environment. For example, the regulatory frameworks established in the mid-20th century reflect instances where vast majorities across parties supported crucial environmental protections. Presently, however, the absence of such a receptive environment raises concerns about the sustainability of climate policy achievements amid stark partisan divisions.
The Impact of Deregulation on Energy Policy
Deregulation has significantly shaped energy policy over the past four decades, reflecting a conservative trend toward market-based solutions over regulatory intervention. This shift, initially sparked by a late 20th-century academic movement, has appealed to both parties, despite differing philosophical justifications. For instance, while Republicans champion deregulation as an efficiency measure, some Democrats have supported market mechanisms to promote renewable energy sources like wind and solar. The podcast emphasizes that both parties have contributed to the current regulatory landscape, which poses challenges in addressing climate change effectively.
Voter Priorities and Political Dynamics
As the upcoming presidential election approaches, energy and climate issues are surprisingly less salient compared to more immediate concerns like reproductive rights and the economy. Despite public polling consistently showing environmental issues ranking low among voter priorities, the podcast emphasizes the importance of acknowledging that some constituents may prioritize climate actions. Additionally, the phenomenon of 'affective partisanship' indicates that voters may oppose policies simply because they are associated with opposing parties, even if those policies may benefit their communities. This dynamic complicates the push for bipartisan climate policy, necessitating new strategies to engage voters across the political spectrum.
David Spence explores the rise of identity politics in the U.S. and how it has fueled bitter partisanship over the transition to clean energy.
---
Throughout American history, opposing political parties have at times set aside their differences to create “republican moments”— periods of bold, bipartisan action to address critical challenges.
Today, such moments may seem unlikely, yet the need for collective action remains urgent. This is particularly true for accelerating the transition to a low-carbon energy system and tackling climate change.
On the podcast, David Spence of The University of Texas School of Law discusses his new book, Climate of Contempt, whichexplores the roots of the current political divide in this country, and how that divide has manifested in the politics of energy. Spence examines the growth of identity politics in the U.S., how even the best-intentioned of actors can stoke partisan flames, and opportunities to re-establish bipartisan dialogue to advance the clean energy transition.
David Spence is the Rex G. Baker Centennial Chair in Natural Resources Law at The University of Texas at Austin.