Russ Roberts, President of Shalem College and a research fellow at the Hoover Institution, dives into decision-making and moral progress. He critiques economics as a science and discusses the intriguing concept of wild vs. tame problems. The conversation explores the nuances of ethical dilemmas, like marriage, revealing the tension between logic and emotions. They also touch on how our choices shape us, the challenges of predicting our future experiences, and the evolution of moral norms in today's context.
40:24
forum Ask episode
web_stories AI Snips
view_agenda Chapters
menu_book Books
auto_awesome Transcript
info_circle Episode notes
insights INSIGHT
Limits of Economics
Economics, while valuable for understanding choices, has limitations.
It often overlooks crucial aspects like belonging, dignity, and the human desire to matter.
volunteer_activism ADVICE
Tame vs. Wild Problems
Use data and algorithms for 'tame' problems with clear solutions, like choosing a movie.
For 'wild' problems like marriage or career, data is less useful; consider intangibles.
question_answer ANECDOTE
Darwin's Marriage Checklist
Darwin's marriage checklist weighed companionship against lost time for science.
He ultimately prioritized personal connection over purely rational considerations.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
In 'Wild Problems,' Russ Roberts addresses the big, uncertain decisions in life—such as who to marry, whether to have children, where to move, and how to forge a life well-lived—that cannot be solved using data, science, or traditional rational approaches. He suggests focusing less on the path that promises the most happiness and more on figuring out who you actually want to be. Roberts draws on the experiences of great artists, writers, and scientists to lay out strategies for reducing fear and the loss of control when facing these 'wild problems.' He argues that life should be experienced as a mystery rather than a problem to be solved, and he critiques the idea of relying solely on cost-benefit analysis and utilitarianism for making life's major decisions.
The theory of moral sentiments
Adam Smith
Published in 1759, 'The Theory of Moral Sentiments' is Adam Smith's first major published work, based on his lectures at Glasgow University. The book argues that morality is driven by humanity's natural sociability and the need for approval from peers, rather than by rational calculation or innate moral sense. Smith introduces key concepts such as sympathy, the impartial spectator, and the invisible hand, which explain how individuals judge the conduct and character of themselves and others. The work delves into the emotional and social aspects of human behavior, highlighting the role of emotions like pity and compassion in shaping moral sentiments and behaviors[1][3][4].
Sam Harris speaks with Russ Roberts about decision-making and the nature of moral progress. They discuss the shortcomings of economics as a science, the power of books, the difference between "wild" and "tame" problems, Darwin’s embarrassing thoughts about the value of marriage, the utility of decision of analysis, incommensurate goods, free riding, counterfactuals, how the decisions we make change us, the difficulty of predicting future experience, changing moral norms, Effective Altruism, free speech, whether we are making moral progress, social media, truth vs comfort, problems with consequentialism, rule-based consequentialism, free will, meditation, and other topics.
If the Making Sense podcast logo in your player is BLACK, you can SUBSCRIBE to gain access to all full-length episodes at samharris.org/subscribe.
Learning how to train your mind is the single greatest investment you can make in life. That’s why Sam Harris created the Waking Up app. From rational mindfulness practice to lessons on some of life’s most important topics, join Sam as he demystifies the practice of meditation and explores the theory behind it.
Making Sense with Sam Harris 
