The Daily Blast: Trump Allies Rage at Each Other as His Latest Nutball Pick Roils MAGA
Nov 25, 2024
auto_awesome
Political scientist Julia Azari, co-author of The Good Politics, Bad Politics Substack, dives into the chaos surrounding Trump’s transition team. She reveals infighting among his allies sparked by controversial appointments like Sebastian Gorka. Azari discusses how Trump misreads his electoral support as a strong mandate, a phenomenon she deems often illusory. Her insights shed light on the troubling implications this has for governance and the broader political landscape as the country gears up for the next election.
Trump's appointment of extreme figures like Sebastian Gorka signals internal conflicts among allies, undermining transition unity and effective governance.
The illusion of a broad electoral mandate allows Trump to overreach, risking authoritarianism and exacerbating tensions with established political institutions.
Deep dives
Internal Conflicts in Trump's Transition Team
Trump's transition team faces significant internal strife as various top allies engage in power struggles. Notably, Elon Musk's private frustrations with Trump lawyer Boris Epstein signal deeper divisions over strategy and control. The appointment of Sebastian Gorka, known for his extreme anti-Islam views, raises eyebrows even among MAGA supporters, indicating potential conflicts within the administration. This infighting suggests that rather than fostering unity, Trump's selections are likely to lead to chaos and make governance more challenging.
The Perils of Perceived Mandates
Trump's assertion of a broad electoral mandate despite not securing a popular majority highlights a common presidential tactic that can lead to overreach. Historical patterns suggest that such claims often coincide with expansions of presidential power that sidestep checks and balances. These declarations frequently serve as a defensive mechanism against opposition, allowing presidents to push through their agendas without accountability. The current political landscape suggests that Trump's approach may exacerbate conflicts with established institutions and the electorate.
The Dangers of Executive Overreach
The conversation underscores concerns that Trump may pursue an increasingly authoritarian approach during his next term, driven by a belief in his personal mandate. Appointing individuals with extreme viewpoints, such as Gorka, suggests a potential disregard for traditional checks on executive power. Unlike previous presidents who faced legislative pushback, Trump's strategy will likely unfold through executive decisions, risking significant overreach. This pattern raises alarms about how unchallenged power could shape governance and the broader implications for American democracy.
Donald Trump’s top allies are already at war with each other over the transition, according to The Washington Post. Meanwhile, Trump just tapped anti-Islam extremist Sebastian Gorka for a big national security role, and that’s unnerving even some in MAGA. Trump is so certain he won a massive mandate that he doesn’t feel obliged to run a smooth transition or refrain from appointing wildly extreme people. We chatted with political scientist Julia Azari, author of a great new piece on presidential delusions about mandates. Azari explains why mandates are usually illusory, how Trump is grotesquely overreading his victory, and why it all bodes badly for what’s to come.