
The Skeptics Guide to Emergency Medicine
SGEM Xtra: On the Boulevard of Broken Dreams – Citation Errors in the Biomedical Literature
Mar 15, 2025
Nicholas Peoples, a standout medical student from Baylor College of Medicine with a rich background in global health, dives into the pressing issue of citation errors in biomedical literature. He reveals that up to 40% of citations may reference non-existent studies, undermining clinical practice. The conversation highlights the role of AI in enhancing citation accuracy and the urgent need for accountability among researchers. They also discuss the cultural shift necessary in academia to ensure integrity and trust in scientific research.
45:37
Episode guests
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- Inaccurate citations in biomedical literature impact research credibility, potentially leading to misguided policies and clinical practices affecting patient safety.
- The principle of burden of proof highlights the need for rigorous evidence in claims, as many citations fail to meet this standard, undermining scientific discourse.
Deep dives
The Prevalence and Impact of Inaccurate Citations
Inaccurate citations are a significant issue in biomedical literature, with estimates suggesting that up to 25% of citations may be flawed. Errors can arise from misquoting studies, citing non-existent findings, or propagating misinformation through citation chains, leading to compromised research credibility. The consequences of these inaccuracies can be severe, influencing treatment guidelines and fostering academic myths that mislead clinicians and policymakers. This ongoing challenge points to a broader systemic issue within the academic community regarding the need for rigorous scrutiny of citations.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.