The Failed Concepts That Brought Israel to October 7

Nov 5, 2024

Shany Mor, a political theory lecturer at Reichman University, dives into the critical missteps leading up to the October 7 attack on Israel. He dissects Netanyahu’s leadership, arguing that indecision and flawed messaging laid the groundwork for disaster. Mor critiques the right-wing settler ideology that overshadowed national security, and the unrealistic peace frameworks that failed to recognize Hamas's true intentions. He also highlights the detrimental role of the international community, suggesting it contributed to these catastrophic failures.

Ask episode

Chapters

Transcript

Episode notes

Intro

00:00 • 2min

Challenges in Israeli Defense: A Critical Analysis

02:09 • 8min

Understanding Refugee Status: UNRWA vs. UNHCR

09:59 • 3min

Critiquing Peace Processes

13:24 • 17min

Incentives of Conflict: Human Sacrifice and International Politics

30:10 • 4min

The essay "The Failed Concepts That Brought Israel to October 7" (Mosaic Magazine) by Shany Mor, dated October 7, 2024, examines the intellectual and policy failures leading up to the October 7 attack on Israel. Mor critiques several conceptual frameworks that have guided Israeli and international policy, particularly in dealing with Gaza and Hamas. These failed ideas include:

1. Netanyahu’s Leadership - Mor argues that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s long-standing skepticism, indecision, and focus on messaging over strategic action contributed to the failure. His belief that Israel could contain Hamas while ignoring broader strategic decisions proved disastrous.

2. Religious Settler Ideology -The right-wing settler movement has, according to Mor, distorted Israeli policy for years. This ideological shift, prioritizing the West Bank settlement agenda over national security interests, has resulted in misguided policies that left Gaza's threat underestimated and unaddressed.

3. Peace Processors’ Delusion -The international peace processors, particularly in Western liberal circles, have perpetuated unrealistic frameworks for Israeli-Palestinian conflict resolution. Mor critiques their belief that diplomacy and incremental concessions could resolve deep-seated ideological conflicts with groups like Hamas, which remain fundamentally opposed to Israel’s existence.

4. The Role of the International Community - Global organizations, including the United Nations and humanitarian NGOs, have indirectly supported the hostile status quo by empowering non-state actors like Hamas. Mor criticizes these bodies for exacerbating rather than mitigating conflict, enabling militias to exercise power without responsibility.

The essay argues that these failed concepts need to be dismantled for Israel and the international community to avoid repeating the mistakes that led to the tragic events of October 7 and to establish a more secure and realistic policy moving forward.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Support our show by becoming a premium member! https://newbooksnetwork.supportingcast.fm/middle-eastern-studies