
The Skeptics Guide to Emergency Medicine SGEM#422: And It was all Yellow-Nasal Discharge and Antibiotics in Pediatric Sinusitis
Dec 2, 2023
Dr. Alasdair Munro, a clinical research fellow in pediatric infectious disease, joins to dissect the nuances of pediatric sinusitis. They analyze a case of a 4-year-old with yellow nasal discharge and fever, questioning if antibiotics are warranted. The conversation highlights the challenges of differentiating between viral and bacterial infections, discusses recent guidelines, and challenges assumptions about nasal discharge color. They also delve into the importance of evidence-based treatment while promoting shared decision-making in pediatric care.
25:53
1 chevron_right 2 chevron_right 3 chevron_right 4 chevron_right 5 chevron_right 6 chevron_right
Intro
00:00 • 2min
Navigating Pediatric Sinusitis Treatment
02:12 • 12min
Rethinking Pediatric Sinusitis Treatment
14:10 • 5min
Navigating the Diagnosis of Pediatric Sinusitis
18:46 • 2min
Understanding Clinical vs. Statistical Significance in Pediatric Care
21:02 • 2min
Navigating Antibiotic Use in Pediatric Sinusitis
22:49 • 3min
Reference: Shaikh N, et al. Identifying children likely to benefit from antibiotics for acute sinusitis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA July 2023
Date: October 17, 2023
Dr. Alasdair Munro
Guest Skeptic: Dr. Alasdair Munro is a clinical research fellow specializing in pediatric infectious disease at the University of Southampton. He is currently involved with clinical trials of vaccines and antibiotics.
Case: A 4-year-old girl presents to your emergency department (ED) with fever and nasal drainage. Her vaccinations are all up to date. Symptoms have been present for the past 12 days. She initially had some cough and congestion which was diagnosed as a viral upper respiratory infection by her primary care doctor. Her symptoms have persisted and yesterday she developed fever (temperature of 38.3°C) and nasal drainage. On physical examination, she has nasal congestion with yellow-colored nasal discharge. The family says to you, “She’s been sick for almost 2 weeks and the color of her nasal drainage changed to yellow. Does this mean she has a bacterial infection that needs antibiotics?”
Background: Distinguishing between sinusitis and viral upper respiratory infections in children is challenging. The symptoms often overlap.
The latest clinical practice guidelines from the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) on the diagnosis and management of acute bacterial sinusitis in children was published in 2013 [1]. Based on those guidelines, a presumptive diagnosis of bacterial sinusitis can be made when a child with URI symptoms has:
persistent illness (nasal discharge, daytime cough) lasting more than 10 days without improvement
worsening course (new or worsening nasal discharge, daytime cough, or fever after initial improvement)
severe onset (fever ≥39°C, purulent nasal discharge for at least 3 consecutive days)
This recommendation only has an evidence quality of B.
We don’t routinely perform sinus aspiration on children, but it is thought that the most common pathogens involved in sinusitis include Streptococcus pneumoniae Hemophilus influenzae, or Moraxella catarrhalis. Untreated sinusitis is associated with complications such as pre septal cellulitis, orbital cellulitis. In bad cases, there can be intracranial involvement that includes cavernous venous thrombosis, osteomyelitis, meningitis, or intracranial abscess.
However, in the interest of antibiotic stewardship. We also do not want to be prescribing antibiotics for viral illnesses.
This issue was covered on SGEM #263. We should be thinking about implementing strategies to reduce the unnecessary prescribing of antibiotics in the emergency department.
Clinical Question: What are the potential benefits and harms of antibiotic treatment for children diagnosed with acute sinusitis and does it depend on bacterial pathogen colonization or color of nasal discharge?
Population: Children aged 2 to 11 years with persistent or worsening acute sinusitis (as per AAP practice guideline) and symptom score of => 9 on Pediatric Rhinosinusitis Scale (PRSS) [2]. This scale ranges from 0-40 with higher scores representing more severe symptoms. Persistent = nasal symptoms, cough or both for 11 - 30 days without improvement. Worsening = period of improvement followed by worsening nasal symptoms or daytime cough, or new onset fever on days 6 - 10.
Exclusion: severe presentation (presence of both colored nasal discharge and fever ≥39°C for 3 or more consecutive days, history of asthma, active wheezing, solely cough, history of allergic rhinitis, immotile cilia syndrome, cystic fibrosis, immunodeficiency, allergy to study medications, concurrent infections, systemic antibiotic use within the previous 15 days, prior sinus surgery, families did not have access to phone or were not English/Spanish speaking
Intervention: 10 days of Amoxicillin/Clavulanic acid
Comparison: Matching placebo
Outcome:
Primary Outcome: Symptom burden (PRSS) during first 10 days after diagnosis
Secondary Outcome: Treatment failure defined as (1) an increase in PRSS score of greater than 20% from enrollment at any time, (2) a decrease of less than 2 points in the PRSS score from enrollment to day 3, (3) a decrease in PRSS score of less than 20% from enrollment to day 4, (4) a decrease in PRSS score of less than 20% from enrollment on 2 consecutive occasions on days 5 to 11, or (5) a decrease in PRSS score by less than 50% from enrollment to the end-of-study follow-up visit. Acute otitis media (AOM). Receipt of another systemic antibiotic
Safety: Non-susceptible pathogen at follow up (S pneumonia or H influenzae). Clinically significant diarrhea (3 or more watery stools for 1 day or 2 watery stools on each of 2 consecutive days). Rash. Other resource utilization. Missed work days.
Type of Study: A multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial.
Authors’ Conclusions: “In children with acute sinusitis, antibiotic treatment had minimal benefit for those without nasopharyngeal bacterial pathogens on presentation, and its effects did not depend on the color of nasal discharge. Testing for specific bacteria on presentation may represent a strategy to reduce antibiotic use in this condition.”
Quality Checklist for Randomized Clinical Trials:
The study population included or focused on those in the emergency department. No
The patients were adequately randomized. Yes
The randomization process was concealed. Yes
The patients were analyzed in the groups to which they were randomized. Yes
The study patients were recruited consecutively (i.e. no selection bias). Unsure
The patients in both groups were similar with respect to prognostic factors. Yes
All participants (patients, clinicians, outcome assessors) were unaware of group allocation. Yes
All groups were treated equally except for the intervention. Yes
Follow-up was complete (i.e. at least 80% for both groups). Yes
All patient-important outcomes were considered. Yes
The treatment effect was large enough and precise enough to be clinically significant. Unsure
Financial conflicts of interest. Multiple doctors receive grants or consult for pharmaceutical companies. Dr. Hoberman has patents for amoxicillin-clavulanate with the same company.
Results: There were 2,923 children screened and 515 were randomized. Around 60% were aged 2 to 5 years old. Most (~70%) were included because they had persistent symptoms. Two thirds had colored nasal discharge and around 70% had some pathogen (strep pneumo, haemophilus, moraxella) detected.
Key Results: Antibiotics may have a clinical benefit in children with acute sinusitis at the cost of increased diarrhea while the detection a pathogen had little impact and color of their nasal discharge did not matter.
Primary Outcome:
Between group difference in symptoms score of -1.69 (95% CI -2.07 to -1.31).
When they looked at the subgroups of children who had bacterial pathogens detected versus those who did not, they also noticed some improvement in the scores.
In those with pathogen detected, there was a difference of -1.95 (95% CI -2.4 to -1.51). In those without pathogen detected, there was still a difference but less at -0.88 (95% CI -1.63 to -0.12).
The effects of the antibiotics did not differ significantly between the groups that had clear vs. colored nasal discharge.
Median length of time to symptoms resolution was 7 days for the antibiotic group compared to 9 days for the placebo group (p=0.003)
Secondary Outcomes:
The antibiotic group was less likely to experience treatment failure, develop acute otitis media, or receive additional systemic antibiotics.
Treatment failure had a risk ratio of 0.69 (95%CI 0.54 to 0.88) and NNT 8.
Receiving another antibiotic had a risk ratio of 0.52 (95%CI 0.36 to 0.76) and NNT of 9.
Development of AOM had a risk ratio of 0 (95% CI of 0 to 0.48) and NNT of 32. This occurred in 3% of the placebo group.
They also did not see any statistically significant difference in resource use between the two groups.
Safety Outcomes:
There was not a difference in non-susceptible pathogens detected at follow up between the two groups. Risk ratio 1.16 (0.63 - 2.13).
The antibiotic group did have more diarrhea with a risk ratio 2.4 (1.26 - 4.59) but no significant difference in rash. Risk ratio 2.05 (0.19 - 22.37)
1) Nasal Discharge Color: Some people say that colored nasal discharge is associated with bacterial infections in comparison to clear discharge. A SRMA from 2014 in adults did not support this position [3].
It is interesting that the authors stratified the study by the color of nasal discharge, when this was removed from the PRSS scale due to the inability of parents to be able to distinguish the color of nasal discharge.
Correlation with pathogen detection was very poor. The authors found a Pearson correlation of 0.13 (95%CI 0.04-0.22). Reminder that a correlation of 1 is a perfect positive correlation.
Nasal discharge color is probably meaningless in determining whether there are bacteria.
2) Selection Bias: They screened 2,923 children and excluded 2,408 which is slightly over 80%. Most of these excluded did not meet diagnostic criteria for sinusitis (~46% of those excluded).
The proportion that declined to participate was also relatively high (19% of those excluded). Interestingly, this group that declined to participate had lower PRSS score (22 vs 24 in those who participated). They also excluded a few because they did not have enough symptoms based on the PRSS score. There were also 95 (4% of those excluded) for “Other reason” but we are never told what those reasons were.
3) Should We Perform Testing? A high percentage (70%) of the cohort included in this had some kind of identifiable pathogen detected (Strep pneumo, Haemophilus influenzae,
