The Megyn Kelly Show
Stormy Daniels Testimony Backfires, and Michael Cohen's Credibility Issues, with Arthur Aidala, Mark Eiglarsh, and Phil Holloway | 789
May 11, 2024
Arthur Aidala, a partner at a top New York law firm, Mark Eiglarsh, a defense attorney known for high-profile cases, and Phil Holloway, a legal analyst, delve into the courtroom drama surrounding Stormy Daniels' testimony. They dissect her fluctuating credibility and its potential impact on the trial against Donald Trump. The trio also scrutinize Michael Cohen's reliability as a witness and the media's questionable ethics in covering the case. Their insights offer a captivating blend of legal analysis and courtroom intrigue.
01:06:42
Episode guests
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- Stormy Daniels' credibility is questioned due to inconsistencies in her testimony about feeling threatened during the alleged encounter.
- The defense strategically highlights contradictions in Stormy Daniels' statements to weaken her credibility in court.
Deep dives
Stormy Daniels Testimony Credibility Challenged by Defense
The defense challenges Stormy Daniels' credibility during the trial by highlighting inconsistencies in her testimony. Susan Necklace questions Daniels about various contradictions in her statements regarding the alleged encounter with Donald Trump in 2006. Necklace focuses on Daniels' changing narrative, pointing out discrepancies in her descriptions of events and reactions during the incident. Daniels' credibility is further undermined as she struggles to explain the inconsistencies, weakening her testimony.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
