Ari Berman, voting-rights reporter for Mother Jones, talks about the chaos of the upcoming 2024 primary season, discussing the disorganized nature of the contests, the confusion of the primary calendar, and the significance of early states like Iowa. He also highlights the controversy and confusion surrounding the Nevada primaries, criticizing the parties for disenfranchising voters.
The disorganization and lack of clarity in the primary process raise concerns about democratic health and voter engagement.
The divergences in dates and processes reflect the political motivations and preferences of each party, causing further confusion in the primary calendar.
Deep dives
The Confusing Primary Calendar: Chaos and Disorganization
The upcoming primary calendar for the 2024 election has been characterized as extremely disorganized compared to past primaries. The Iowa caucuses, usually held on a Tuesday, are scheduled for Monday, which is Martin Luther King Jr. Day. The Democratic and Republican primaries are not being held on the same date, adding to the confusion. While the process may seem orderly due to the lack of competitive primaries, the whole calendar would be a complete mess if there were competitive races. The disorganization and lack of clarity in the primary process raise concerns about democratic health and voter engagement.
Democratic and Republican Divide in the Primary Calendar
The order of the Democratic and Republican primaries and caucuses differs significantly. Iowa, New Hampshire, and Nevada have traditionally been the first states for both parties. However, Democrats have been considering demoting Iowa due to its lack of diversity and its inability to count votes properly in the 2020 election. Republicans, on the other hand, are happy with Iowa's Republican dominance. South Carolina, a state favoring Democrats, wants to go first, but Republicans insisted on sticking to the traditional order. The divergences in dates and processes reflect the political motivations and preferences of each party, causing further confusion in the primary calendar.
Republicans' Unorthodox Approach in Nevada
In Nevada, Republicans have decided to hold both a primary and a caucus due to conflicting state laws and disagreements with Democratic-led election rules. Candidates for the Republican nomination must choose between participating in the caucus or the primary, splitting the field. The strict voting and identification requirements for the caucus may disenfranchise many voters compared to the primary. This unusual approach not only creates logistical challenges and confusion but also reinforces worries about election integrity and signals potential violence and threats against election officials.
If you enjoy this show, please consider signing up for Slate Plus. Slate Plus members get benefits like zero ads on any Slate podcast, bonus episodes of shows like Slow Burn and Dear Prudence—and you’ll be supporting the work we do here on What Next. Sign up now at slate.com/whatnextplus to help support our work.