Understanding Presidential Immunity

The defendant claims immunity from prosecution by asserting that his actions were part of his official presidential conduct. However, the legal assessment reveals that the defendant engaged in a private scheme to disrupt the electoral process, acting as a candidate rather than as president. The Supreme Court's precedent stipulates that while presidents may be immune for official conduct, this protection does not extend to private actions taken for personal political gain. Thus, the court is urged to conclude that the defendant must stand trial for his private criminal conduct related to the 2020 election.