Highlights: #196 – Jonathan Birch on the edge cases of sentience and why they matter
Aug 30, 2024
auto_awesome
Jonathan Birch, an expert in sentience, dives into intriguing discussions on the history of neonatal surgery sans anesthesia and the misconceptions surrounding pain in newborns. He sheds light on the complex link between fetal sentience and abortion, arguing for bodily autonomy in advocacy. The conversation delves into the ethical stakes of neural organoids and the potential for AI sentience through computational emulation. Birch also champions the importance of citizen assemblies in policymaking, highlighting the value of public perspectives in scientific ethics.
The podcast reveals the disturbing history of neonatal surgeries without anesthesia, illustrating how overconfidence in medical ethics can lead to severe patient harm.
It emphasizes the critical need to separate discussions of fetal sentience from abortion rights to ensure the protection of bodily autonomy and women's rights.
Deep dives
Historical Context of Neonatal Surgery Practices
The podcast discusses the shocking history of neonatal surgery performed without anesthetic in the 1980s, which led to significant public outcry. This practice, which was deemed acceptable at the time, resulted in harrowing cases of traumatic experiences for newborns, highlighting the severe stress responses these infants endured during surgeries. Influential scientists, facing intense backlash, gathered evidence demonstrating that these stress responses could jeopardize the babies' chances of survival and lead to developmental issues. The subsequent change in clinical practices underscores the importance of reevaluating deep-seated beliefs about the capacity for pain in newborns and illustrates the dangers of overconfidence in medical ethics.
Overconfidence in Assessing Consciousness
The conversation brings attention to a major task force report from the 1990s that incorrectly asserted patients in vegetative states could not feel pain due to the presumed inactivity of cortical mechanisms. This overconfidence in the scientific understanding of consciousness at the time resulted in a lack of protective measures for affected patients, reflecting a significant gap in the then-nascent science of consciousness. Historical misjudgments like these serve as cautionary tales, indicating that both the risks of premature conclusions and the need for a more cautious approach in clinical settings are paramount. As the field evolves, the importance of considering the consequences of these assessments is increasingly recognized, leading to a shift towards a more prudent clinical practice.
Fetal Sentience and the Autonomy Debate
The podcast navigates the complex issue of fetal sentience, arguing that discussions should remain distinct from the legality and ethics surrounding abortion. It emphasizes that the foundation for the right to access abortion lies in the serious implications of forced pregnancy, which is a severe violation of bodily autonomy. Concerns arise regarding potential arguments that tie the right to abortion to fetal sentience, as new evidence could challenge these claims and undermine women's rights. By advocating for a separation of these issues, it highlights the need to assess and protect bodily autonomy independent of developments in fetal consciousness.
This is a selection of highlights from episode #196 of The 80,000 Hours Podcast. These aren't necessarily the most important, or even most entertaining parts of the interview — and if you enjoy this, we strongly recommend checking out the full episode:
