398 – William: Winning Friends and Influencing People Is For Suckers
Aug 20, 2022
auto_awesome
Guest Brand, the holy man who asked Edgar the AEtheling to confirm him as the Abbot of Peterborough after the Battle of Hastings. Topics include William's legitimacy challenge, the conflict faced by Brand, Norman fortifications, insecurity in the new Norman rule, and William's unpopularity and political challenges.
William challenged the legitimacy of Harold and Edgar to solidify his own position as the legitimate ruler of England.
William's treatment of Abbott Brand demonstrated his disregard for the norms and rules that he insisted upon for others.
Deep dives
William's strategy of questioning legitimacy
William used the strategy of questioning everyone else's legitimacy to muddy the political waters and deflect attention from his own illegitimacy. He aimed to destroy the concept of legitimacy, which was a key strategy for him because he was a bastard and not legitimately chosen as king. William challenged the legitimacy of Harold and Edgar, both of whom were proclaimed kings by the wit-hand. By propagating the idea that they were illegitimate usurpers, William aimed to solidify his own position as the legitimate ruler of England.
Abbott Brand's difficult position
Abbott Brand faced a tough situation during William's reign. Although he was already confirmed in his position by King Edgar the Athling, William demanded that Brand be confirmed again, challenging the legitimacy bestowed by Edgar. Brand had to appeal to William and pay a hefty fee of 40 marks of gold to secure his appointment and protect his lands from being seized or given to others. William's treatment of Brand demonstrated his disregard for the norms and rules that he himself insisted upon for others.
Insecurity in William's rule and treatment of English
William's grip on power and his position as king remained insecure, leading him to adopt aggressive and brutal tactics. The English people, including the aristocracy, showed signs of growing resentment and hostility towards him. William's treatment of the English was marked by violence, greed, and favoritism. He built fortresses in London and along the Thames, constraining the people and imposing his rule through fear. William's behavior and actions demonstrated his increasing insecurity in maintaining control and the widespread resistance he faced.
Insecure rule and tactics in Normandy and beyond
William's rule in Normandy and his claim on the counties of Brittany and Maine were also marked by insecurity and aggressive tactics. He had long-standing feuds with ruling families in these regions and used methods such as secret claims, marriage alliances, and annexation to consolidate power. His attempt to assert authority and suppress rebellion was evident in his treatment of the ruling class, including taking English leaders as hostages and appointing Norman aristocrats to rule England. However, William's grip on power remained uncertain, and his actions and coinage choices reflected his precarious state as a ruler.
Do you remember the holy man who asked Edgar the AEtheling to confirm him as the Abbot of Peterborough, just after the Battle of Hastings? Well, that guy’s name was Brand. The previous Abbot of Peterborough, Leofric, had actually marched to Hastings with Harold. But Leofric didn’t make it. So the job fell to Brand, […]