Letters from an American November 24, 2025
28 snips
Nov 26, 2025 The discussion dives into a judge’s ruling that invalidated key indictments due to an unlawful attorney appointment. It explores the 120-day rule governing interim U.S. Attorneys and how this legal backdrop shaped the court's decision. Hear about James Comey’s concerns over the weaponization of the DOJ. The show also examines an administration shift toward military justice, with notable implications for Senator Mark Kelly and links to QAnon-era rhetoric. Kelly's response highlights his service and warns against political violence, adding layers to the unfolding drama.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Court Blocks Weaponized Prosecutions
- Heather Cox Richardson explains that Judge McGowan-Curry voided indictments because Trump's interim U.S. attorney appointment violated law and the Constitution.
- The ruling prevents presidents from bypassing Senate confirmation to weaponize DOJ against political enemies.
Forced Replacement Led To Rapid Indictments
- Trump replaced interim U.S. attorney Eric Siebert after Siebert declined to prosecute Comey and Letitia James.
- Lindsey Halligan then secured grand jury indictments within days, illustrating direct political interference.
Rule Of Law Versus Political Targeting
- James Comey framed the case as a test of whether a president can use DOJ to target political enemies.
- The judge's decision reinforces protections of rule of law against such misuse.