Supreme Court case Missouri versus Biden aims to protect free speech online from government censorship and coercion of social media platforms.
Legislation proposed by Sen. Eric Schmidt empowers individuals to sue government actors for censorship, reinforcing free speech rights.
Deep dives
The Importance of Protecting Free Speech Online
The upcoming Supreme Court case, Missouri versus Biden, is crucial for protecting free speech online. The case focuses on government censorship of social media platforms and the coercion of these platforms to suppress certain viewpoints. Tens of thousands of pages of evidence reveal government officials pressuring social media companies to censor differing opinions, violating the First Amendment. If successful, this case could prevent agencies from using censorship to control speech online, ensuring individuals' rights to express their opinions without government interference.
The Threat of Government Coercion Towards Social Media Giants
The case highlights government coercion and collusion with social media giants to silence dissenting voices. Emails and text messages show high-ranking officials pressuring platforms to remove content, specially targeting conservative viewpoints. This Orwellian practice of government control of speech undermines the foundation of free expression in America. By challenging this behavior in court, the case aims to prevent agencies from using their power to suppress opinions online.
Protecting Individual Rights to Sue Against Censorship
In addition to the Supreme Court case, legislation proposed by Senator Eric Schmidt empowers individuals to sue government actors for censorship. This legislation would provide citizens with recourse if they are censored or de-platformed unfairly due to their viewpoints. By enabling citizens to hold government officials accountable for violating free speech rights, this legislation aims to reinforce the importance of individual expression and push back against government overreach.
Fighting Against Manipulative Crisis Narratives
Investigations into border crises in Texas reveal the manipulation of narratives by politicians on both sides for political gain. The crises at the border are exploited to expand voting bases and further political agendas. The real story behind border issues uncovers the complexities and contradictions in political responses to the influx of migrants. By shedding light on the realities at the border, the investigation challenges misconceptions and political exploitation of crises for partisan purposes.
Glenn discusses the loss of sovereignty in America. Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-Mo.) joins to discuss the Fani Willis decision and the possibility of SCOTUS ruling to end government collusion with Big Tech. Contributing editor for the Spectator and host of "Weekly Dumpster Fire" Bridget Phetasy joins to discuss the current state of America and how Glenn bounces back during times of fear.