Open to Debate Was Trump Right to Be Hard on Soft Power in the Middle East?
33 snips
Apr 18, 2025 
Faisal Saeed Al Mutar, President of Ideas Beyond Borders, discusses the implications of the Trump administration's shift from soft power in the Middle East, arguing it was a necessary strategy against rivals like Iran and China. Jeffrey Gedmin, CEO of the Middle East Broadcasting Networks, counters that it harms America's image and undermines long-term stability in the region. The conversation dives into the effectiveness of U.S. foreign policy, the balance of hard and soft power, and the evolving dynamics with Israel amidst regional threats.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Soft Power Failed in Middle East
- Billions spent on Middle East soft power have not reduced authoritarianism or anti-American sentiment.
- In places like Iraq, Jordan, and Tunisia, U.S. efforts failed to change hearts and minds meaningfully.
Soft Power Still Has Appetite
- Despite challenges, there's still demand for U.S.-funded media in the Middle East and North Africa.
- Imperfect American engagement is preferable to U.S. withdrawal and letting rivals fill the void.
Aspirational Soft Power Goals
- U.S. soft power aims to foster accountable governance, rule of law, and pluralism in the Middle East.
- These are long-term, aspirational goals not achieved quickly or transactionally.