Jaden Edison, a public education reporter for the Texas Tribune, dives into the controversial integration of Bible stories into Texas public school curriculums. He discusses the implications of teaching history from a Christian perspective, raising concerns about the First Amendment. The conversation highlights the heated debates around the Blue Bonnet Learning curriculum and the challenges teachers face due to recent legislative changes. Edison also reveals the political dynamics influencing educational policies and the potential legal ramifications of these developments.
The new Texas curriculum incorporates Bible stories for teaching reading, raising concerns about the potential violation of the First Amendment.
Critics argue the curriculum's religious bias may alienate non-Christian students and distort historical accuracy in public education.
Deep dives
Curriculum Controversy in Texas Education
The State Board of Education in Texas is deliberating the approval of a new reading program known as Blue Bonnet Learning, which incorporates Bible stories into its curriculum. This approach has sparked significant debate, with advocates arguing for its inclusion due to the cultural relevance of biblical teachings, while others express concerns about its appropriateness in public schools. Critics, including some Christian voices, warn that the curriculum may inadvertently alienate non-Christian students and that its religious content could potentially breach the separation of church and state. This contentious atmosphere was evident at the board meetings, where supporters and opponents of the curriculum passionately voiced their opinions.
Legislative Background of the Curriculum Shift
The recent push for this curriculum can be traced back to a 2011 law that decentralized textbook approvals, which overburdened teachers and contributed to a teacher shortage. In response, the Texas legislature passed House Bill 1605 to streamline the curriculum development process, promising a state-approved curriculum to alleviate teachers' workload. The current dispute centers around the modification of previously approved materials, led by an advisory panel predominantly comprised of figures with faith-based backgrounds. The alterations have raised questions about the motivations behind this curriculum overhaul and who ultimately benefits from its incorporation into public education.
Legal and Social Implications of the Curriculum
The implications of adopting this curriculum may extend beyond classrooms, potentially leading to legal challenges regarding constitutional rights. Supporters claim that understanding biblical context is essential for grasping Western literature and history, yet this rationale overlooks significant historical inaccuracies within the curriculum. Notably, the handling of sensitive topics such as American slavery contrasts sharply with how other historical events, like the Holocaust, are taught, leading to accusations of bias and ahistoricity. The outcome of this debate not only affects educational policies but may also set a precedent for similar interventions in states with rising religious advocacy in education.
New curriculum for Texas public schools teaches vocabulary and reading through stories from the Bible and takes a noticeably Christian point of view towards history. When does teaching stop and preaching begin—and isn’t this a pretty clear violation of the First Amendment?
Guest: Jaden Edison, public education reporter for the Texas Tribune.
Want more What Next? Join Slate Plus to unlock full, ad-free access to What Next and all your other favorite Slate podcasts. You can subscribe directly from the What Next show page on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Or, visit slate.com/whatnextplus to get access wherever you listen.
Podcast production by Elena Schwartz, Paige Osburn, Anna Phillips, Madeline Ducharme and Rob Gunther.