Sasha Latypova, a former big pharma executive, unveils her startling research on covid countermeasures, revealing them as products of a covert military operation. She examines the controversial role of vaccines and the unsettling history behind their regulation, delves into allergic reactions and the implications of injecting foreign proteins, and critiques societal beliefs about health risks. Latypova also explores speculative ideas on genetic ethics, immortality, and the narratives surrounding bioweapons, encouraging listeners to question established truths.
Vaccines lack the stringent regulation seen in pharmaceuticals, posing significant public health risks that need addressing for informed decision-making.
Historical vaccination practices are intertwined with eugenics, raising ethical concerns about the origins and intentions behind vaccination campaigns.
The connection between vaccination and rising food allergies invites a critical reevaluation of potential long-term health effects of immunization practices.
Deep dives
Importance of Regulation in Vaccines
The discussion highlights that vaccines are not as regulated as pharmaceuticals, which can create significant public health risks. The guest, an experienced pharmaceutical executive, expresses shock at the lack of stringent oversight compared to other pharmaceutical products. This inadequate regulation can lead to harmful outcomes, as vaccines may be released to the public without appropriate safety measures. Understanding this disparity is crucial for the public to make informed decisions regarding vaccinations.
Historical Context of Vaccination Practices
The podcast delves into the historical evolution of vaccination practices, revealing a troubling lineage linked to eugenics. The guest explains how early vaccination strategies were rooted in the desire to control certain populations, portraying them as a method to improve public health. This historical perspective raises concerns about the ethical implications of vaccination campaigns throughout history. By examining these origins, the conversation challenges the narrative that vaccines are always beneficial and safe.
Anaphylaxis and Vaccines
Anaphylaxis is addressed as a potential reaction to vaccinations, which the guest argues is not well understood by the general public. The notion that any protein, including benign substances like food, can trigger anaphylactic reactions when injected is emphasized. The conversation underscores that the potential for such severe reactions is often downplayed in vaccination discussions, leaving people uninformed about the risks. This gap in knowledge can have serious consequences for public health.
Public Perception and Vaccination Discourse
The podcast also touches upon the challenges of discussing vaccines in a public setting, where people often react defensively to dissenting opinions. The guest shares personal experiences of encountering skepticism and hostility when raising concerns about vaccine safety. This highlights a broader issue where discussing vaccines can be stigmatized, making it difficult for critical analysis of public health policies. Such dynamics hinder open dialogue necessary for informed decision-making within society.
Connection Between Allergies and Vaccines
Interestingly, the conversation draws a connection between the rise in food allergies and vaccination practices, suggesting vaccinations may exacerbate or trigger such conditions. The guest revisits personal anecdotes from their upbringing, indicating how food allergies were largely absent before the introduction of extensive vaccination schedules. This perspective invites reevaluation of the correlations between vaccination and the increasing prevalence of allergies in modern populations. By linking these health issues, the discussion pushes for a deeper investigation into the long-term effects of vaccination.
Critique of Current Scientific Paradigms
A critical examination of current scientific paradigms, particularly in genetics and infectious disease, is presented throughout the episode. The guest argues that contemporary models, like those surrounding DNA and viruses, are based on outdated or incomplete understandings of biology. Such paradigms can mislead policymakers and the public when formulating health strategies. This skepticism urges a reevaluation of established scientific principles, promoting a more nuanced understanding of health and disease.
Alexandra 'Sasha' Latypova is a former big pharma industry exec. Her research has exposed how all covid countermeasures, including the biological warfare agents marketed as ‘covid-19 vaccines’ were created, produced and distributed in a covert military program, where the pharma manufacturers only worked as subcontractors.
Monetary Metals is providing a true alternative to saving and earning in dollars by making it possible to save AND EARN in gold and silver.
Monetary Metals has been paying interest on gold and silver for over 8 years.
Right now, accredited investors can earn 12% annual interest on silver, paid in silver in their latest silver bond offering. For example, if you have 1,000 ounces of silver in the deal, you receive 120 ounces of silver interest paid to your account in the first year.
Go to the link in the description or head to https://monetary-metals.com/delingpole/ to learn more about how to participate and start earning a return on honest money again with Monetary Metals.
