

Top Physicists Call Out Many Worlds As Nonsense | Jacob Barandes Λ Emily Adlam
7 snips Jun 25, 2025
In this engaging discussion, Harvard Professor Jacob Barandes, known for his innovative thoughts on quantum mechanics, and physicist-philosopher Emily Adlam challenge the Many Worlds Interpretation. They argue it's more philosophical illusion than science, debating its lack of testability and real-world relevance. The conversation dives into the perplexities of self-identity, the nature of probability, and the hard problem of consciousness, revealing how deeply intertwined our understanding of reality is with philosophical insights.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Distinguishing Self-Locating Uncertainty Types
- There is a qualitative difference between pure and superficial self-locating uncertainty.
- In Everettian multiverse, it is a pure self-locating uncertainty with no physical process selecting outcomes.
Probability Challenges Without Branch Selection
- Everettian many-worlds involves a deterministic single world with branching realities, not separate possible worlds.
- Probability is mysterious without a physical selection process like a hopping ego choosing branches.
Credences Depend on Personal Goals
- In self-locating scenarios, rational credence depends on your personal goals, not universal rules.
- Rationality cannot impose a single correct probability when many identical observers exist.