Kevin Kosar, a senior fellow at AEI, discusses the works of political scientist Edward Banfield and the lessons they hold for government planning. They delve into Banfield's book 'Government Project' and the failed cooperative farm in Arizona. The podcast also explores the complexities of management, factions at the farm, time horizons related to success and poverty, and frustration with prior beliefs.
Government Project by Edward Banfield demonstrates the limitations of government planning and the importance of clear lines of responsibility.
Ed Banfield's approach of managing social problems rather than seeking perfect solutions aligns with the idea of limited government and cautious policy-making.
Deep dives
The Life and Work of Ed Banfield
Ed Banfield was a well-known and controversial figure in the field of public policy. He was a professor at Harvard and a vocal critic of many social policy proposals of the 1960s. His research often debunked the effectiveness of left-leaning policies and pointed out potential pitfalls and unintended consequences. Banfield's most famous book, The Unheavenly City, tackled issues of poverty, culture, and short-term thinking, challenging prevailing views on these topics. He argued that poverty is not solely a matter of material wealth, but also stems from cultural attitudes and behaviors. Banfield's work laid the foundation for a new conservative perspective on societal issues and made him one of the founding fathers of neoconservatism.
Government Project: Analyzing a Failed Cooperative Farm
Government Project was a book by Ed Banfield that examined a failed cooperative farm established by the government. The farm aimed to address the financial struggles of individual farmers and migrant workers by fostering cooperation and self-governance. However, despite apparent success on the surface, the community eventually collapsed due to inherent confusion in its design and conflicting goals. Banfield's analysis revealed that successful cooperatives required individuals who understood and valued cooperation, as well as clear lines of responsibility and decision-making. The book highlighted the limitations of government intervention, emphasizing that complex social issues cannot be easily solved through top-down directives.
The Importance of Managing Problems Rather than Solving Them
Ed Banfield stressed the need to manage problems rather than seeking perfect solutions. He argued that public policy, such as immigration reform, cannot fully solve complex issues but could be improved incrementally. Banfield cautioned against promising permanent solutions and instead advocated for realistic management of social problems. This approach recognizes the limitations of government and the importance of balancing various interests and perspectives. Banfield's views aligned with the idea that government should be limited and reflect a more cautious approach to policy-making, emphasizing the need to consider unintended consequences and the diversity of human nature.
Empowering Congress to Better Address Regulatory Issues
In order to address the challenges posed by an expansive administrative state, Kevin Kosar proposed two measures to empower Congress. Firstly, he suggested the creation of a Congressional Regulation Office, similar to the Congressional Budget Office, which would provide legislators with expertise in evaluating regulations and their impacts. This office would enable Congress to meaningfully participate in regulatory decision-making, offering a counterbalance to the executive branch. Secondly, Kosar recommended implementing legislation akin to the Rains Act, which would require congressional approval for major regulations. These measures would help rebalance the power relationship between Congress and the administrative state, allowing for more effective oversight and decision-making.
If you’ve never been a resident of the Washington egghead-osphere, you’re probably not familiar with the 20th-century political scientist Edward Banfield. But Kevin Kosar—a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and noted KISS fanatic—thinks that you should be. In 1951, Banfield published Government Project, an account of the U.S. government’s attempt to remake the lives of some of its citizens by establishing a cooperative farm in Arizona during the Great Depression. The project didn’t go so well, and Kevin believes it holds vital lessons about the limits of government planning that Americans across the political spectrum would be wise to recall today. Tune in for neocon nerdery, but stick around for some more contemporary wonkery on what’s gone wrong with Congress.