

The Constitution vs the National Bank: Edmund Randolph’s Analysis
May 3, 2024
Attorney General Edmund Randolph opposed Alexander Hamilton's Bank Bill as unconstitutional, highlighting the 10th Amendment. He scrutinized the implications of federal government creating corporations and challenged arguments for the national bank. Randolph's views clashed with Hamilton's 'necessary and proper' clause interpretation, cautioning against expansive governmental powers and unchecked authority.
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
1 2 3 4 5
Introduction
00:00 • 2min
Edmund Randolph's Analysis of the National Bank
02:23 • 5min
Scrutiny of Arguments for the National Bank Under the Constitution
07:34 • 4min
Analysis of Edmund Randolph's Views Contrasted with Alexander Hamilton's Interpretation
11:10 • 2min
Constitutional analysis of the National Bank and Historical Context
13:01 • 4min