Reasonable Faith Podcast Question of the Week #957: Jesus’ Crucifixion and Resurrection
5 snips
Sep 24, 2025 A listener from Nepal raises a thought-provoking question about Jesus' crucifixion and resurrection. The discussion delves into the historical facts surrounding the resurrection, exploring what is widely accepted versus the philosophical debates over its supernatural nature. The conversation encourages an openness to considering supernatural explanations, especially for those who believe in God. It's a captivating dive into the intersection of faith, history, and philosophy.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Two-Step Structure For Resurrection Case
- William Lane Craig distinguishes two steps in arguing for the resurrection: establishing facts and finding the best explanation.
- The facts he lists include burial, empty tomb, post-mortem appearances, and disciples' sudden belief in resurrection.
Established Facts Form The Basis
- Craig lists specific facts historians agree on that require explanation for the resurrection case.
- These facts form the empirical basis before considering explanatory hypotheses.
Disagreement Is Philosophical Not Historical
- Craig says scholars disagree at the explanation stage, not about the core historical facts.
- He argues many remain agnostic because naturalist commitments rule out the resurrection hypothesis.