Nate Persily, a Stanford Law professor specializing in election administration, joins the discussion to dissect the current threats to election integrity. He shares insights on the complexities of new voting laws and the risks posed by losing experienced election officials. The conversation reflects on historical electoral challenges, such as the Bush-Gore election. Additionally, they explore the impact of celebrity endorsements on public opinion and how figures like Kamala Harris are navigating these evolving political landscapes.
Kamala Harris's debate performance was well-received, yet its actual influence on undecided voters remains ambiguous and uncertain.
The endorsements from celebrities like Taylor Swift and Liz Cheney sparked diverse reactions, showcasing the complex interplay of celebrity influence in politics.
Professor Nate Persily emphasized potential chaos on Election Day due to evolving voting laws and turnover among election officials, indicating a turbulent electoral process ahead.
Deep dives
Kamala Harris's Debate Performance
Kamala Harris's recent debate performance was perceived positively by pundits, with many declaring her the winner. However, the impact of her performance on the undecided voters remains uncertain, as many still appear to be unresolved in their choices. Harris's strategy focused on highlighting her own plans and identity, yet critiques arose regarding the level of detail she provided on her policies during the debate. Despite successfully portraying Trump as chaotic, it remains unclear if this will sway the opinions of independent voters who are looking for substantial policy proposals.
Endorsements and Public Reactions
The episode discussed notable endorsements for Harris, particularly from Liz Cheney and Taylor Swift, which stirred various public reactions. Swift's endorsement reached a younger audience eager for political engagement, evidenced by a surge in visits to voter registration sites linked to her announcement. Meanwhile, Cheney's endorsement, coming from a historical figure loathed by many Democrats, raised questions about its effectiveness in changing minds among skeptical voters. These endorsements illustrate the complex dynamics of celebrity influence in political campaigns, as they create both excitement and skepticism in the electorate.
Election Day Concerns
Nate Persley shared his insights on potential issues expected on Election Day, including chaos and confusion rather than widespread vote suppression. Persley emphasized that recent developments in voting laws and a significant turnover among election officials could contribute to misunderstandings among voters. Specific state-level changes, such as new ballot requirements and ongoing litigation, were highlighted as potential stressors impacting the election process. This atmosphere of uncertainty fosters anxiety among voters and election workers alike, hinting at a tumultuous election period ahead.
Trump's Debate Behavior
The podcast highlighted Donald Trump's behavior during the debate, illustrating his tendency to become emotionally reactive when provoked. Analysts pointed out that his inability to adhere to strategic debate tactics revealed deeper flaws in his character, particularly his focus on self-interest over the greater good. Trump's historical rally dynamics, where he often centers on chaos and fictional narratives, were analyzed as detrimental to his image. His performance, marked by erratic responses, serves as a critical indicator of his suitability for continued leadership, based on the expectation of a candidate's ability to remain composed under pressure.
The Aftermath of the Debate
Following the debate, analysts considered the implications of the outcomes and the resulting narratives surrounding each candidate. While Harris's performance was celebrated within her support base, analysts questioned whether it would effectively resonate with ambivalent voters. The discussion included comparisons to past election cycles, where the stakes were exceptionally high and the response from the electorate could shift following pivotal moments. There was a consensus that while Harris may have solidified her standing among supporters, the overarching political landscape's stability remains uncertain as opinions among undecided voters linger in flux.
This week, Emily Bazelon, John Dickerson, and David Plotz discuss Kamala Harris’ win against Donald Trump in the presidential debate; the Harris endorsements by Taylor Swift and Dick and Liz Cheney; and election integrity with Professor Nathaniel Persily of Stanford Law School.
Email your chatters, questions, and comments to gabfest@slate.com. (Messages may be referenced by name unless the writer stipulates otherwise.)
Podcast production by Cheyna Roth
Research by Julie Huygen
Public.com+Public Investing Disclosure: Public Investing offers a High-Yield Cash Account where funds from this account are automatically deposited into partner banks where they earn interest and are eligible for FDIC insurance; Public Investing is not a bank. See public.com/#disclosures-main for more information.
