The discussion centers around Leo Tolstoy's influential essay, emphasizing art's purpose as a form of emotional communication. Tolstoy critiques counterfeit art, asserting that true artistry transcends social elitism. There's a deep dive into modern art production and the essential support systems behind it. The conversation draws parallels with Nietzsche, highlighting the societal implications of artistic expression. Ultimately, it presents art as a transformative force aimed at uniting humanity under shared values.
Tolstoy critiques the elitist and self-absorbed nature of contemporary art, advocating for a return to more communal and accessible expressions.
He argues that the true essence of art lies in its ability to evoke emotions and foster meaningful connections among people.
Tolstoy insists that art must justify its existence by serving societal good and promoting unity and moral clarity among its audience.
Deep dives
Tolstoy's Artistic Duality
Leo Tolstoy is primarily recognized as a novelist, yet his philosophical writings, particularly in his essay 'What is Art?', provide profound insights into the nature of art itself. In his later years, he sought to reconcile the artistic process with a deeper understanding of its significance. By approaching art from both a creative and introspective stance, Tolstoy uniquely positions himself to explore complex questions about art's purpose and value. This duality allows for the merging of artistic expression and philosophical inquiry, making his contributions to art criticism both relevant and insightful.
Defining True Art
Tolstoy argues that mere definitions of art fail to capture its true essence, which he sees as fundamentally tied to human experience and communication. He posits that art transcends physical forms such as paintings or sculptures; rather, it resides in the ability to convey and evoke emotions. The distinction between good and bad art is crucial to Tolstoy's analysis, as he believes that without a clear understanding of art's aim, one cannot discern its value. This insistence on meaning challenges traditional perspectives that view art merely as aesthetic pleasure or functionality.
Art's Moral Responsibility
At the core of Tolstoy's philosophy lies the conviction that art must justify its existence, especially given the societal labor and resources it often consumes. He raises critical questions about whether art, which often requires great sacrifices from others, serves an essential and redeeming purpose. Tolstoy insists that art should not only entertain but foster a sense of unity and moral clarity among its audience. This demand for art to align with societal good elevates the discourse on art's role, emphasizing its potential for social change and ethical engagement.
The Evolution of Artistic Expression
Tolstoy highlights the shift in art from community-oriented expressions to individualized, elite-driven creations, arguing that this change diminishes art’s communicative power. He critiques the specialization within artistic communities that leads to insular forms of art, ultimately alienating broader audiences and undermining universal artistic value. This fractionation transforms art into an exclusive domain of the elite, where true communication and emotional resonance are often lost. Tolstoy’s call for a return to more communal and accessible forms of art reflects his desire for art to regain its foundational role in fostering human connections.
The Role of Critics and Arts Education
Tolstoy provides a scathing critique of art critics, arguing that their interpretations often detract from the genuine emotional experience intended by the artist. He believes that criticism can create barriers between the artist and the audience, leading to a misunderstanding of art's essence. Furthermore, by learning techniques and engaging in stylistic imitations, artists may lose sight of personal expression and the emotional core of their work. For Tolstoy, true art emerges not from academic training or critical analysis but from the sincere expression of feelings that can universally connect individuals.
Art as a Means of Human Connection
According to Tolstoy, the true function of art lies in its ability to transmit emotions and create connections among people, akin to a form of shared language. He posits that art should be a medium for uniting people in shared feelings, thereby fostering empathy and understanding across differences. This perspective positions art not merely as a tool for personal expression but as a vehicle for societal harmony and progress. Tolstoy insists that to fulfill its potential, art must serve humanity's collective emotional experience, thereby achieving a higher moral and ethical standard.
I released a song today! Go check it out on Invisible Oranges: https://www.invisibleoranges.com/slumbering-sun-together-forever/
The new single is also live anywhere that you stream music, including spotify, apple, etc. You can also visit our bandcamp to pre-order the album or purchase the single now: https://slumberingsun.bandcamp.com/album/starmony
This episode is a discussion of my favorite essay by Tolstoy, the contents of which factored heavily into my book (The Ritual Madness of Rock & Roll) as one of my major influences on the topic of aesthetics. Tolstoy poses the problem of art, the reason why art must justify itself. Criticizing the existing conceptions of art's value, he puts forward his own theory as to art as communicative, then attacks what he considers to be the self-absorbed art of the upper class and the counterfeit art that has captured European culture. Eventually, Tolstoy comes to the conclusion that true art is aimed at the Christian vision of the unification of man. This is the conclusion of the second leg of season five.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
