Can the techniques used to solve homicides be the same tools to establish the case for Christianity?

J. Warner Wallace was a seasoned homicide detective and a devout atheist. But everything changed when he turned his investigator’s eye towards the claims of Christianity, applying ten common rules of evidence that he’d used to solve crimes throughout his career.

The result? A transformation from skepticism to faith, and a bestselling book, “Cold-Case Christianity,” which has just released an updated and expanded 10th anniversary edition.

In this latest conversation with Detective Wallace we talk about how he used his skill set as a detective to evaluate the claims of Christianity.

We’ll also learn about how we can employ the rules of evidence when evaluating the reliability of the Gospels.
We’ll learn the important difference between direct and indirect evidence and how this impacts how we try to present the truthfulness of the Christian faith.
We’ll also hear his advice for those who are earnestly seeking to understand whether or not the claims of Christ are true.

To see the show notes, explore links to other resources, or watch our conversation visit ReasonableTheology.org/coldcase

Pick up a copy of Cold Case Christianity: https://amzn.to/3Pp1eVu

Get a free trial of Logos at ReasonableTheology.org/Logos

Support the show

GET THE NEWSLETTER
Each edition of the Reasonable Theology newsletter contains my latest article or podcast episode PLUS:

A Theological Word or Phrase Explained Quickly and Clearly
A Painting Depicting a Scene from Scripture or Church History
Audio of a Hymn or other Musical Selection to Enjoy
A Recommended Book or Resource to Expand Your Library

SUBSCRIBE HERE

Minnesota Vikings HOTTEST takes after win over Green Bay Packers