Lisa Herzog, "Citizen Knowledge: Markets, Experts, and the Infrastructure of Democracy" (Oxford UP, 2023)
Feb 1, 2024
auto_awesome
Explore the relationship between democracy and epistemology, focusing on responsible information gathering and historical critiques of citizen ignorance. Learn about the hazards of market-based thinking in democracy and how it interfaces with expert communities and public deliberation. Discover an integrated political epistemology for democracy through Lisa Herzog's book 'Citizen Knowledge: Markets, Experts, and the Infrastructure of Democracy'.
Lotocracy promotes public voice through lotteries, revealing challenges in addressing systemic inequalities.
Expert communities provide specialized knowledge crucial for informed decision-making in democracies.
Public deliberation enhances social justice and inclusive participation, strengthening democratic values and addressing inequities.
Deep dives
Challenges of Lotocracy in Modern Democracy
Lotocracy, a system advocating for more regular use of lotteries instead of elections, aims to give normal people a voice in public deliberations. However, challenges arise when public discourse remains distorted due to existing inequalities. The reliance on lotocracy alone may not address systemic issues appropriately.
Importance of Expert Communities in Democratic Decision-Making
Expert communities play a vital role in a democratic society, offering specialized knowledge necessary for informed decision-making. While promoting equal access to political decision-making, integrating expert knowledge effectively requires a partnership model where responsibilities for the public and experts are balanced.
Epistemic Contributions of Public Deliberation in Democracy
Public deliberation serves as a critical mechanism for sharing and building knowledge in a complex democratic society. Incorporating public deliberation enhances social justice and promotes inclusive participation in decision-making processes. Engaging in robust public discourse is essential to strengthen democratic values and address social inequities.
Realism and Democratic Values
In addressing critiques from realism that question the efficacy of democracy, a balanced approach involves reducing the dominance of market-driven thinking within democratic systems. Emphasizing the importance of intermediate institutions and group-based understanding can mitigate challenges associated with individualistic perspectives in democratic decision-making.
Quantitative vs. Qualitative Research in Understanding Political Realities
A shift towards more qualitative research is advocated to anchor social scientific knowledge in the context of real-world political dynamics. Qualitative studies help inform quantitative research by providing rich insights and understanding of societal complexities beyond mere survey data, thus improving the depth and applicability of research findings.
For better or worse, democracy and epistemology are intertwined. For one thing, politics is partly a matter of gathering, assessing, and applying information. And this can be done responsibly or incompetently. At least since Plato, a leading critique of democracy has focused on the ignorance of ordinary citizens. Historically, this kind of critique has supplied the basis for several nondemocratic proposals. Yet it has also worked in the background of a range of views within democratic theory. Among these are views that have relied on markets as mechanisms for sharing and distributing information.
But there are hazards to market-based thinking about democracy. In Citizen Knowledge: Markets, Experts, and the Infrastructure of Democracy (Oxford UP, 2023), Lisa Herzog explores three conceptually distinct sites where democracy interfaces with epistemology: markets, expert communities, and public deliberation. The result is an integrated political epistemology for democracy.
Robert Talisse is the W. Alton Jones Professor of Philosophy at Vanderbilt University.