IUL Index Allocation Strategies Analyzed

If you own indexed universal life insurance or you're considering buying it, you've probably looked at all the index options and wondered which one to choose. In this episode, we dive deep into the data to answer that question with empirical analysis rather than guesswork.

We examine the two most common index options available across IUL contracts: the traditional S&P 500 annual reset with a cap and the uncapped strategy with a spread. Using 20 years of market data, we test different allocation strategies to determine which approach delivers the best results.

You'll discover why the "optimal" choice might matter less than you think, with total differences of only about 1% over two decades. More importantly, we reveal how splitting your allocation between capped and uncapped options can significantly reduce volatility while maintaining nearly identical returns to the best-performing single option.

We also explore why volatility matters even in IUL contracts that have downside protection. If you're planning to take distributions from your policy in the future, understanding how to minimize years with minimal credits becomes crucial for maintaining consistent income.

The analysis shows that a 50/50 or 55/45 split between capped and uncapped options produces a Sharpe ratio of 1.7, compared to 0.6-0.8 for direct S&P 500 investments. This demonstrates quantitatively why IUL serves as a non-correlated asset rather than direct market exposure.

___________________

Ready to optimize your IUL strategy or have questions about indexed universal life insurance? Contact us to discuss how these allocation strategies might work for your specific situation.