

Episode Fifty-Two: Panel Discussion (Balabanov, Ellis, Hilliard, Cottee)
62 snips Dec 19, 2024
In a thought-provoking discussion, experts Stephanie Cottee, an animal behavior scientist, Stewart Hilliard, a behavioral neuroscientist, and legendary trainer Michael Ellis delve into the contentious AVSAB position statement on training methods. They challenge common misconceptions surrounding force-free and aversive techniques, highlighting the importance of a balanced approach to dog training. The panel emphasizes animal welfare, the psychological impacts on both dogs and their owners, and the need for evidence-based practices that advocate for resilience and a strong human-animal bond.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Complexity of Aversive Training Effects
- AVSAB's claim that aversive methods damage welfare and bonds oversimplifies complex training realities.
- Responsible aversive use can enhance safety and relationships, contradicting blanket negative claims.
Welfare Linked to Control & Predictability
- Animal welfare depends on predictability and control, not just stress avoidance.
- Stress is natural; effective coping skills define true welfare, beyond momentary reactions.
Beyond Immediate Stress Responses
- Welfare is about quality of life, not fleeting stress moments.
- Resilience and recovery from aversive stimuli matter more than the immediate reaction.