

Five Eyes and 5G: the Huawei debate
Apr 25, 2019
Tim Cross, the Technology editor for The Economist, dives into the controversial decision by Britain to allow Huawei to provide equipment for 5G networks, shedding light on potential security risks and the strain on international alliances. He contrasts the U.S. and U.K. approaches to Huawei and discusses the geopolitical consequences of these choices. The conversation also touches on the impact of the Mueller report, revealing how its disclosures affect political polarization in America, alongside a look at how nature in office design enhances worker productivity.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
UK's Huawei Decision
- Britain will allow Huawei limited access to its 5G network periphery, raising security concerns among allies.
- The decision involves balancing national interests with Five Eyes intelligence sharing.
US Concerns on Huawei
- America worries about Huawei's potential for spying and sabotage due to its Chinese origins and the critical nature of 5G infrastructure.
- This concern reflects broader superpower rivalry and China's challenge to American technological dominance.
Diverging Security Approaches
- Britain and America, despite close security ties, differ on Huawei due to Britain's need for diverse suppliers and potentially its desire to maintain good relationships with both America and China.
- Britain might also find managing Huawei's risk easier due to its network structure and existing policies.