Bonus Episode: The 28th Messidor of Matt Christman
Jul 17, 2017
auto_awesome
Podcaster, writer, and Marx enthusiast Matt Christman discusses Karl Marx's '18 Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte'. Topics include Napoleon III's rise to power, Marx's analysis of the proletariat's role in the revolution, the lack of class consciousness among rural peasants, and insights from Team Bruhmer on class rule.
Marx's analysis of Napoleon III's rise to power highlights the farcical nature of events and exposes the decay of institutions and revolutionary mechanisms.
Marx critiques the alliance between the proletariat and the petite bourgeoisie, arguing that it masks class divisions and fails to address the true interests of the working class.
Deep dives
Marx's theory of history and the farcical nature of Napoleon III
Marx's essay, 'The 18th Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte,' further develops his theory of class as the driver of history. He compares the rise of his nephew, Napoleon III, to the seizure of power by his uncle, Napoleon. Marx criticizes Napoleon III as a buffoon and a fraud, highlighting the incompetence and mediocrity of the ruler. He emphasizes the farcical nature of the events, where power was taken by an unworthy figure, exposing the decay of institutions and revolutionary mechanisms. Marx's analysis sheds light on the complex dynamics within the French bourgeois, the conflicts between different factions, and how the rise of Napoleon III resolved those tensions. His work challenges conventional narratives and demonstrates the role of class interests in shaping historical events.
The role of the proletariat and the limitations of the alliance with the petite bourgeoisie
Marx examines the role of the Parisian proletariat in the 1848 revolution and its subsequent involvement in the political landscape. He sees the working class as a transitional force, moving from a class in itself to a class for itself. However, he acknowledges the limitations of their consciousness due to their isolation and lack of shared experiences. Marx critiques the alliance between the proletariat and the petite bourgeoisie, referring to it as a social democratic party. He argues that the alliance masks the class divisions and fails to address the true interests of the working class. The analysis underscores the importance of recognizing and organizing around class interests rather than adhering to outdated revolutionary traditions.
The peasantry as reactionary force and Marx's analysis of the lumpen proletariat
Marx examines the role of the peasantry, specifically highlighting their support for Napoleon III. He characterizes them as a sack of potatoes, lacking a unified class interest due to their isolation and absence of shared experiences. Marx argues that the lack of class consciousness among the peasantry hinders their ability to engage in collective action. Additionally, he delves into the concept of the lumpen proletariat, a marginalized group without a direct connection to the capitalist system. Marx notes their inability to organize along class lines and explains how their reactionary tendencies contributed to the rise of Napoleon III. His analysis sheds light on the complexities of class dynamics and the impact of different social groups on historical events.
A discussion on Karl Marx's '18 Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte' with podcaster, writer, and Marx enthusiast Matt Christman. Topics include Napoleon III's rise to power and why you are a potato in a sack