Mhairidh Evans, VP and head of CCUS research at Wood Mackenzie, and Peter Findlay, director of CCUS economics, share their insights on carbon capture technologies. They discuss the viability of CCUS in achieving net zero, emphasizing its critical role in hard-to-decarbonize sectors like cement and steel. The guests explore regional policy differences, the impact of government incentives like the U.S. 45Q tax credit, and the necessity for community support. They also consider the future of carbon pricing and its potential to drive investment in this essential technology.
CCUS is essential for achieving net-zero emissions, particularly in challenging sectors like cement and steel production, integrating with other technologies for effective decarbonization.
Government policies significantly influence CCUS adoption, with the U.S. focusing on financial incentives like the 45Q tax credit, while Europe emphasizes high carbon pricing and compliance funding.
Deep dives
The Role of CCUS in Decarbonization
Carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) is increasingly viewed as a necessary technology for achieving net-zero emissions, particularly in hard-to-decarbonize sectors such as cement and steel production. Despite concerns that CCUS may serve as greenwashing, experts argue that it plays a crucial role alongside renewable energy in the broader energy mix. The process involves not only capturing CO2 emissions but also recycling them for useful applications, thereby promoting sustainability. While CCUS alone cannot solve emissions problems, its integration into decarbonization strategies seems inevitable for meeting global climate goals.
Sector-Specific Adoption of CCUS
Different industries exhibit varying attitudes towards the adoption of CCUS technology based on their specific emission profiles and operational challenges. For instance, cement production faces inherent CO2 emissions due to its chemical processes, making CCUS critical for achieving net-zero targets. Meanwhile, the steel industry explores alternatives like hydrogen-fed processes, although CCUS remains a viable option due to the high heat requirements of steel production. As industries evaluate their decarbonization pathways, CCUS is often combined with other technological innovations tailored to their unique circumstances.
Policy Drivers and Geographical Variations
Government policies play a pivotal role in shaping the future of CCUS, with distinct approaches observed between the United States and Europe. In the U.S., tax credits like the 45Q provide financial incentives for capturing emissions, fostering growth in the sector. Conversely, European governments leverage a combination of high carbon prices and funding opportunities for projects, mandating industry compliance while encouraging innovation. This divergence impacts project timing and development, as regions with stronger policy frameworks tend to attract a greater number of CCUS initiatives and investments.
Investment Landscape and Future Outlook
The CCUS market is expected to see substantial growth, requiring significant investment over the next decade to reach targets of capturing hundreds of millions of tons of CO2 annually. Researchers and analysts forecast around $200 billion in total investments, predominantly concentrated in North America, with additional growth anticipated in Europe and the Asia-Pacific region. The success of this sector hinges on the interplay of technology advancements, economic feasibility, and policy support. Stakeholders are urged to focus on political trends and public sentiment, as these factors will dictate the trajectory and viability of CCUS projects moving forward.
With global emissions on the rise, the pressure to decarbonise is driving interest in CCUS (carbon capture, utilisations and storage) … but is CCUS a viable path to net zero, a temporary solution or ahigh-cost gamble that may simply just perpetuate the use of fossil fuels?
Sylvia Leyva Martinez, principal analyst at Wood Mackenzie, sits down to talk with fellow Wood Mackenzie team members, Mhairidh Evans, VP, head of CCUS research and co-head of carbon management and Peter Findlay, director of CCUS economics, about the complex nuances of CCUS.
The trio discusses policy support differences between North America and Europe, the impact of government incentives like the U.S. 45Q tax credit, and the need for community buy-in for infrastructure projects. They also explore potential pathways for CCUS growth, address obstacles and opportunities for technology advancement and speculate on whether a consistent global carbon price could be a game-changer.
With insights into real-world CCUS projects and the market conditions influencing investment, the conversation highlights the factors that could determine CCUS’s role in the energy transition.
———————————————————
Subscribe to the Interchange Recharged so you don’t miss an episode on Apple Podcasts or Spotify. Find us on X – we’re @interchangeshow.
The Interchange Recharged is brought to you by Anza Renewables. Are you wasting valuable time tracking down solar module information that quickly goes stale? Anza’s revolutionary platform can help with up-to-date pricing, technical, risk, and domestic content data from 110 solar modules. Compare products in minutes and redirect your time to higher value work. Find out more at go.anzarenewables.com/woodmac