In this enlightening conversation, Kim Lane Scheppele, a Princeton professor specializing in the law of autocracy, discusses the alarming implications of Trump’s emerging second administration. She highlights how executive orders echo global authoritarian tactics seen in countries like Hungary and Russia. The manipulation of legal systems to undermine democracy is explored, along with the chilling effects on marginalized groups, particularly the LGBTQ+ community. Scheppele warns of the urgent need for public engagement to combat the rise of autocracy in America.
The podcast highlights the alarming speed of Trump's executive orders, mirroring authoritarian tactics used in countries like Hungary to erode democracy.
Identity protection services like LifeLock are essential in safeguarding against legal repercussions and identity theft during rising authoritarianism.
Grassroots movements and civic engagement are crucial for resisting authoritarianism and reinforcing democratic values in society amidst political upheaval.
Deep dives
Identity Protection and Legal Ramifications
The podcast emphasizes the importance of safeguarding personal identity amidst rising authoritarianism and legal challenges. With the surge of executive orders that infringe on rights, such as the ban on transgender service members, individuals are increasingly vulnerable to identity theft and legal repercussions. LifeLock's identity protection services are presented as vital for individuals aiming to secure both their digital and physical lives during uncertain political times. The discussion highlights how legal frameworks can be exploited in this environment, making identity security an essential part of personal safety.
The Threat of Authoritarianism
The recognition of the rise of authoritarianism in the U.S. is a central theme explored in the podcast. Notably, the episode delves into how Trump’s executive orders mirror tactics used by autocrats in other countries, such as Hungary, and outlines a worrisome pattern of diminishing checks on executive power. Experts argue that the chaos generated by these orders serves a dual purpose: distracting the public while simultaneously consolidating power. This abstraction of authoritarianism, facilitated by seemingly legal means, poses a significant threat to democratic structures and societal well-being.
Manipulation of Law and Governance
The potential manipulation of legal frameworks to undermine democracy is extensively analyzed in the episode. Autocrats often use the law as a tool to entrench their power, camouflaging their actions as lawful while eroding checks and balances. The discussion reveals how past experiences in countries like Hungary serve as alarming warnings for the U.S., emphasizing that the takeover of legal systems can be gradual and insidious. This highlights the critical need for vigilance in recognizing legal maneuvers that threaten the core principles of democracy.
The Role of Distractions in Governance
The episode stresses the strategic use of distractions by those in power to overshadow significant legal changes aimed at consolidating authority. It posits that while the media and public focus on immediate and sensational issues, more subtle but impactful changes are being enacted behind the scenes. The impact of executive decisions on daily life, such as potential cuts to essential services and programs, is underscored to demonstrate how these distractions can distort public perception. Keeping the public's attention diverted is a critical tactic that helps sustain autocratic governance.
Grassroots Resistance and Civic Engagement
The discussion underscores the necessity for grassroots movements and civic engagement in resisting authoritarianism. Individuals are encouraged to seek out local organizations and initiatives that bolster democratic values and challenge the erosion of rights. Activism can manifest in various ways, from community engagement to legal challenges, all aimed at slowing down the encroachment on democracy. By mobilizing collective efforts and leveraging community resources, citizens can play a vital role in pushing back against authoritarian impulses.
If you’re punch-drunk and disoriented this week, come on in. Donald J Trump’s second administration is materializing at frightening speed and recklessness and it is hard (and stressful) to keep up with it all. Kim Lane Scheppele, the Laurance S. Rockefeller Professor of Sociology and International affairs at Princeton University, explains that the speed and viciousness of the legal orders in Trump 2.0 are evidence that America switched over to the fast track for autocracy on January 20th, 2025. An expert in the law of autocracy, Scheppele has seen firsthand what happened to constitutional courts and the democratic norms that governed them in Russia and Hungary and she joins Dahlia Lithwick on Amicus this week to explain how Trump’s executive orders on everything from government funding to transgender people in the military reveal a familiar global playbook that has chillingly familiar endpoints.
Un-paywalled episodes' description:
Want more Amicus? Join Slate Plus to unlock weekly bonus episodes with exclusive legal analysis. Plus, you’ll access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. You can subscribe directly from the Amicus show page on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Or, visit slate.com/amicusplus to get access wherever you listen.