Rebeccah Heinrichs, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute and national security expert, dives into the pressing global challenges facing the U.S. She discusses the complexities of U.S. foreign policy in response to China and Russia’s aggressive maneuvers. Heinrichs critiques rising populism in Europe and urges a renewed clarity in American values. The conversation also highlights the strategic importance of Ukraine for NATO and warns against historical misrepresentations that could affect America’s global role.
The resurgence of great power conflicts requires the U.S. to reevaluate its national security strategies in response to China and Russia.
The collaboration between authoritarian regimes poses a serious threat to global stability, necessitating a deeper understanding of their interdependencies.
A reassertion of U.S. national values is crucial to address skepticism in foreign policy and reinforce its international standing.
Deep dives
The Rise of Great Power Conflict
The current global landscape is marked by a resurgence in great power conflicts, particularly involving China and Russia. Historically, after the Cold War, the U.S. enjoyed a relatively uncontested period of dominance, but the end of that era has given rise to renewed tensions. Both China and Russia are actively contesting the U.S. position, with China enhancing its military capabilities and Russia leveraging alliances with other adversarial nations. This shift necessitates a reevaluation of national security strategies to respond effectively to the growing challenges from these authoritarian powers.
Implications of Authoritarian Alliances
The collaboration between authoritarian regimes like China, Russia, North Korea, and Iran is increasingly threatening the stability of global order. Notably, these nations are working in concert to disrupt U.S. interests by supporting proxy groups and arming factions that resist American influence. For example, Iranian proxies have fueled conflicts in the Middle East, complicating the U.S. role in regions already fraught with warfare. This interdependence among adversarial states signals a significant shift in geopolitical dynamics, making it imperative for the U.S. to understand these relationships to formulate effective counter-strategies.
Challenges in U.S. Foreign Policy
U.S. foreign policy is currently hindered by an overarching fear of escalation, particularly concerning military confrontations with adversaries. The administration's hesitance to provide robust support to allies, such as Ukraine, has led to protracted conflicts that could have been mitigated with stronger deterrent actions. This reluctance reflects a broader pattern where U.S. responses have been reactive instead of proactive, diminishing the credibility of American power on the global stage. A recalibration of policies to engage more confidently with adversarial states is essential to restore U.S. influence and ensure compliance with international norms.
The Importance of Moral Clarity
The rise of moral ambiguity in U.S. foreign policy has created a rift in how Americans perceive their national identity and role in global affairs. Historical missteps have fueled skepticism among the populace regarding whether the U.S. can genuinely claim to champion democracy and human rights. Addressing this skepticism requires a reassertion of national values while recognizing and correcting past mistakes in foreign interventions. By clarifying moral intentions and principles, the U.S. can reinforce its international standing and motivate a renewed commitment to support allies and confront adversaries.
The Future of Global Leadership
Looking ahead, the U.S. must navigate the intricate balance between asserting its leadership and managing relationships with long-standing rivals. A coherent strategy that combines diplomacy with a readiness to defend allies will be crucial in shaping the future of international relations. The potential for cooperation exists, but it hinges on the U.S. maintaining its resolve against dictatorial ambitions in regions like Taiwan and Eastern Europe. Ultimately, the ability to articulate and enact a vision of global order where democratic values prevail will determine the U.S.'s role on the world stage.
The Bulletin’s Mike Cosper sits down with Rebeccah Heinrichs, senior fellow at Hudson Institute, for a conversation about national security and America’s role in geopolitics.
Rate and review the show in your podcast app of choice.
Leave a comment in Spotify with your feedback on the discussion—we may even respond!
TODAY’S GUESTS:
Rebeccah L. Heinrichs is a senior fellow at Hudson Institute and the director of its Keystone Defense Initiative. She specializes in US national defense policy with a focus on strategic deterrence.Dr. Heinrichs currently serves as a commissioner on the bipartisan Strategic Posture Commission, which was created in the Fiscal Year 2022 National Defense Authorization Act. She also serves on the US Strategic Command Advisory Group and the National Independent Panel on Military Service and Readiness. She is an adjunct professor at the Institute of World Politics, where she teaches nuclear deterrence theory, and is also a contributing editor of Providence: A Journal of Christianity and American Foreign Policy.
ABOUT THE BULLETIN:
The Bulletin is a weekly (and sometimes more!) current events show from Christianity Today hosted and moderated by Clarissa Moll, with senior commentary from Russell Moore (Christianity Today’s editor in chief) and Mike Cosper (director, CT Media). Each week, the show explores current events and breaking news and shares a Christian perspective on issues that are shaping our world. We also offer special one-on-one conversations with writers, artists, and thought leaders whose impact on the world brings important significance to a Christian worldview, like Bono, Sharon McMahon, Harrison Scott Key, Frank Bruni, and more.