Dive into the fascinating journey of how the New Testament canon was formed. Explore the criteria and processes that guided early church leaders in discerning authentic texts. The discussion addresses objections regarding inconsistencies, emphasizing the interplay between human fallibility and divine guidance. It's a thought-provoking look at faith traditions and the community's role in shaping what is considered scripture.
The process of canonization, though fallible, is trustworthy due to its foundation in Jewish and early Christian traditions.
Distinctions between the canonization of scriptures and later doctrines, like the assumption of Mary, highlight varying historical foundations.
Deep dives
Trust in God's Guidance During Canonization
The process of canonization in the early church, although fallible, can still be considered trustworthy due to evidence from both Jewish and early Christian traditions. For instance, similar to how the Old Testament was received by the people of Israel without infallible operations, the New Testament canon evolved over time through organic consensus. This organic process involved various criteria, including apostolicity and widespread acceptance, which ultimately led to an agreement about the New Testament scriptures in the 4th century. Recognizing that the Church's understanding of canon emerged from fallible means underscores that trust in God's guidance remains intact despite human limitations.
Distinguishing Between Canonization and Other Church Doctrines
A critical differentiation is made between the process of canonization and the acceptance of certain church doctrines, such as the bodily assumption of Mary. The canonization process began early in the church, with references to scripture made by New Testament authors, whereas the notion of Mary's assumption emerged much later without early widespread acknowledgment. This difference illustrates that while the recognition of canon occurred over several centuries, other beliefs may not have the same historical foundation and should be approached with greater scrutiny. Thus, it is possible to trust the canon while remaining discerning about other later-developed doctrines.
1.
Trusting the Fallible: The Process of New Testament Canonization