Should Australia Ban Teens from Social Media? w/ Cam Wilson
Dec 5, 2024
auto_awesome
Cam Wilson, associate editor at Crikey, sheds light on Australia’s controversial plan to ban social media for those under 16. He explores the influences of media ownership on this decision and its implications for tech regulation. Wilson argues that an outright ban may not be the most effective solution, highlighting potential mental health risks for youth. The discussion also questions the motivations behind the policy, advocating for a balanced approach that ensures online safety without sidelining vulnerable groups.
Australia's proposed ban on under-16s using social media is driven by societal concerns and the influence of major media campaigns.
The effectiveness of the proposed ban is questioned, as it may overlook the complex relationship between social media and mental health.
The e-Safety Commissioner's role is crucial in shaping online safety regulations, balancing user protection with tech industry interests.
Deep dives
Consolidation of Power in Tech Companies
The current landscape reveals that technology is increasingly concentrated within a small number of powerful companies, raising concerns about regulation and accountability. As these corporations exert substantial influence over various aspects of daily life, there is a growing recognition of the necessity for government intervention to manage industry practices and safeguard public interests. The effectiveness of regulatory measures hinges on the public's trust in government, which may be threatened if initial regulations fail to deliver the promised benefits. Therefore, establishing credibility with the public is essential, as any failures in regulation could hinder future initiatives aimed at more precise, targeted reforms.
Australia's Proposal to Ban Under-16s from Social Media
Australia is advancing a contentious policy to prohibit individuals under 16 years of age from using select social media platforms, igniting widespread discussion and debate. This proposal is gaining traction globally, with various countries considering similar measures. The motivation behind the ban stems from a combination of societal concern for children's wellbeing and a backlash against perceived harms attributed to social media usage, particularly during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. However, while the intent is to protect vulnerable populations, critics argue that this approach lacks nuance and fails to address the underlying issues affecting not just younger users but all demographic groups engaging with these platforms.
Influence of Media in Promoting Regulation
The role of major media entities, notably News Corp, has significantly influenced the push for stricter regulations on social media. Campaigns spearheaded by these media outlets, which focus on the detrimental impacts of social media on youth, have resulted in considerable public support for the proposed ban. This grassroots sentiment has compelled both government leaders and opposition figures to align with the policy despite criticism from experts who question its efficacy. Ultimately, the media's enthusiastic endorsement underscores the intersection of public sentiment and political action, revealing how narratives can shape policy decisions in real-time.
Concerns About the Efficacy of the Ban
Critics argue that the ban on social media usage for individuals under 16 fails to account for the complex realities of social media's impact on mental health. Existing research suggests that while social media can indeed pose risks for younger users, the relationship between digital engagement and mental wellbeing is multifaceted and multidimensional. By adopting a prohibition-centric approach, the policy may inadvertently overlook other more effective strategies for fostering healthier online environments for all. Moreover, the focus on age restrictions could discourage a comprehensive examination of the technological features and algorithms that contribute to negative experiences for users of all ages.
The Role of the E-Safety Commissioner
The position held by the e-Safety Commissioner is instrumental in shaping Australia's approach to online safety and regulation. This office has been granted remarkable powers to enforce compliance with online safety standards and can mandate measures to be taken by tech companies to protect users, particularly children. While the current commissioner has demonstrated a diplomatic approach to working with both the government and tech companies, concerns remain about the extent of control this position holds over digital spaces. As regulations evolve, the effectiveness of this role may ultimately determine whether Australia can foster a safer online environment while balancing innovation and regulatory oversight.
Paris Marx is joined by Cam Wilson to discuss Australia’s plan to ban under-16s from social media, the interests driving it, and whether it’s the right approach to tackle the harms of those platforms.
Cam Wilson is associate editor at Crikey.
Tech Won’t Save Us offers a critical perspective on tech, its worldview, and wider society with the goal of inspiring people to demand better tech and a better world. Support the show on Patreon.
The podcast is made in partnership with The Nation. Production is by Eric Wickham. Transcripts are by Brigitte Pawliw-Fry.
